QUOTE (supernovasp @ Jun 19 2004, 12:16 PM)
QUOTE (vn1234 @ Jun 19 2004, 01:21 PM)
Yes Buddhism was in VN before the Chinese took over, actually the first contact that China had with Buddhism was from VN, not India, though China wasn't too fond of Buddhism back then and only until Bodhi Dharma from India a few hundred years later did China have a more prevalent side of Buddhism. What's "animist" - I googled it and found weird results?
Any proofs? Most of "Kinh phat" are translated from chinese. Unlike other Southeast Asian, we follow Mahayana Buddhism which China was the main "distrbutor" to its sino-influenced countries : Japan, Korea, and Vietnam. Also, Buddhism didn't even flourish in Chinese domination time, but in the Ly dynasty.
Unless we follow Theravāda Buddhism, then your statement would be reasonable
Yes lotsa proof, just google something like "Khuong Tang Hoi" or "Khương Tăng Hội"
This has been accepted internationally now and was evident a long time ago in historical circles. The thought that VN Buddhism came from China is very debunked.
Most of the Kinh in VN are translated from China because of the 1000 years of rule. We are influenced by Chinese Buddhism to a certain extent, but Buddhism came to VN before China. Actually yes Buddhism did flourish in the Chinese domination, but it was not revealed much until now because we have recovered new artifacts - Buddhism never waned in VN.
Here take a look at this link presented to the International Association of Asian Studies, held in Houston, TX, February 21-26, 2000 (gotta read the whole thing - including the footnotes please)
here are some blurbs from there:
QUOTE
K’ang Seng-hui was better known as the first Buddhist propagator in southern China (arrived Ch’ien-yeh 248 C.E.),45 by all authorities on Chinese Buddhism. They also believe that K’ang translated the Liu tu chi ching from Sanskrit into Chinese.
K’ang Seng-hui is Khương Tăng Hội
QUOTE
This work is divided into 12 chapters. Ch. I, Buddhism in the Hung Vuong era, relates the transmission of the Buddha's teachings by monk Phat Quang to Chu Dong Tu and his wife Tien Dung, daughter of a Hung king (c. 3rd cent. B.C.E.).
So as you can see as early as the 3rd BCE
QUOTE
Besides re-reading concerned texts as described, Dr. Le Manh That, on many hazardous field trips walked through Vietnam, during 1974-1975, visited remote and unlikely places throughtout the countryside and discovered many rare manuscripts and wood-blocks, by ancient Vietnamese Buddhist authors, lying incognito on dusty shelves of desolete temples or private houses. All in all, he collected more than 300 texts that have never been known to exist before. This discovery helps confirm with concrete proof popular belief that Vietnamese civilization - history, language, literature and Buddhism- existed prior to and independently from Chinese civilization. This should change all that has been written about the history of Vietnam in general and of Vietnamese Buddhism in particular. These texts are still preserved intact in his study, awaiting attention and interest from scholars worldwide.
QUOTE
These works, including introductions, translations, annotations and analytical commentaries on these Ch'an Masters' classical texts, should be known to and shared by scholars worldwide. Their existence proves that there is no paucity of Buddhist activity or literature during the 15th-19th centuries as always claimed.
Many more Buddhist personalities are discovered, especially those living in the 15th-18th centuries during which time Confucianism is thought to have been favoured over Buddhism by the ruling powers.
http://www.quangduc.net/English/0202buddhisminvietnam.html But he's chinese :S. I am very confused by your proof.
Also how do they know that "history, language, literature and Buddhism" existed before Chinese domination, if there were no hard-proof of vietnamese own writing before Chunho or Hanzi.
Buddhism didn't flourish in China, so where and how they can translate the "kinh" from China?