Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Vietnamese- How Smart Are We?
Asia Finest Discussion Forum > Asian Culture > Vietnamese Chat
Pages: 1, 2, 3
Nam Quoc Son Ha
What do you think? Any statistics to back it up?
fujisan_8
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Jun 19 2004, 07:17 AM)
What do you think? Any statistics to back it up?

I don't think this is a good topic or indicator...

What basis can one base this on? One thing, look at our country, its well...

$hit.
Nam Quoc Son Ha
QUOTE (fujisan_8 @ Jun 19 2004, 07:59 AM)
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Jun 19 2004, 07:17 AM)
What do you think? Any statistics to back it up?

I don't think this is a good topic or indicator...

What basis can one base this on? One thing, look at our country, its well...

$hit.

I'm talking about the Vietnamese intelligence, not how the country is doing.
fujisan_8
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Jun 19 2004, 08:12 AM)
QUOTE (fujisan_8 @ Jun 19 2004, 07:59 AM)
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Jun 19 2004, 07:17 AM)
What do you think? Any statistics to back it up?

I don't think this is a good topic or indicator...

What basis can one base this on? One thing, look at our country, its well...

$hit.

I'm talking about the Vietnamese intelligence, not how the country is doing.

Yeah if we were smart enough then ouir country wouldn't be backward.

Intelligence...its a very abstract topic and since you wrote compared to mother Asians...taht is a topic looking for a flame war...

Honestly all humans are intelligent...

Please define some constraints...
Nam Quoc Son Ha
QUOTE (fujisan_8 @ Jun 19 2004, 08:17 AM)
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Jun 19 2004, 08:12 AM)
QUOTE (fujisan_8 @ Jun 19 2004, 07:59 AM)
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Jun 19 2004, 07:17 AM)
What do you think? Any statistics to back it up?

I don't think this is a good topic or indicator...

What basis can one base this on? One thing, look at our country, its well...

$hit.

I'm talking about the Vietnamese intelligence, not how the country is doing.

Yeah if we were smart enough then ouir country wouldn't be backward.

Intelligence...its a very abstract topic and since you wrote compared to mother Asians...taht is a topic looking for a flame war...

Honestly all humans are intelligent...

Please define some constraints...

I don't get, what does our intelligence have to do with our country being backward?

I only blame the Chinese, French and Americans for the present state of Vietnam.
fujisan_8
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Jun 19 2004, 08:27 AM)
QUOTE (fujisan_8 @ Jun 19 2004, 08:17 AM)
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Jun 19 2004, 08:12 AM)
QUOTE (fujisan_8 @ Jun 19 2004, 07:59 AM)
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Jun 19 2004, 07:17 AM)
What do you think? Any statistics to back it up?

I don't think this is a good topic or indicator...

What basis can one base this on? One thing, look at our country, its well...

$hit.

I'm talking about the Vietnamese intelligence, not how the country is doing.

Yeah if we were smart enough then ouir country wouldn't be backward.

Intelligence...its a very abstract topic and since you wrote compared to mother Asians...taht is a topic looking for a flame war...

Honestly all humans are intelligent...

Please define some constraints...

I don't get, what does our intelligence have to do with our country being backward?

I only blame the Chinese, French and Americans for the present state of Vietnam.

Yes blaming shows how intelligence we Viets are... icon_rolleyes.gif

Intelligence and backwardness...if we had the intelligence we would have properly managed our country....the intelligence to adopt Western technology and improve Vietnam...just like the Japanese and Koreans did to theirs.

Intelligence is not only about making breakthroughs...all that Science and stuff..it's also about management and quickly reacting to change, able to accept change...etc...that is what I am referring to when I point out the Intelligence-Backward country relationship..

We Viets were not intelligent enough to improve out country.

Peripheral countries like Japan, Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam need to wisen up and ally yourself with the best and leading powers. The first three on the list had succeeded to do so whilst Vietnam unfortunately was not intelligent enough to stop the Communists when it had teh chance. Vietnam needn't Communism ... we would be on par or better than Korea had we seized the chance when we did have it.
Kewell7
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Jun 19 2004, 08:27 AM)
QUOTE (fujisan_8 @ Jun 19 2004, 08:17 AM)
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Jun 19 2004, 08:12 AM)
QUOTE (fujisan_8 @ Jun 19 2004, 07:59 AM)
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Jun 19 2004, 07:17 AM)
What do you think? Any statistics to back it up?

I don't think this is a good topic or indicator...

What basis can one base this on? One thing, look at our country, its well...

$hit.

I'm talking about the Vietnamese intelligence, not how the country is doing.

Yeah if we were smart enough then ouir country wouldn't be backward.

Intelligence...its a very abstract topic and since you wrote compared to mother Asians...taht is a topic looking for a flame war...

Honestly all humans are intelligent...

Please define some constraints...

I don't get, what does our intelligence have to do with our country being backward?

I only blame the Chinese, French and Americans for the present state of Vietnam.

I don't think you should blame other countrie's for one countries state of affairs. If that is the case, shouldn't you blame your own countrymen like Ho Chi Minh for trying to reunify Vietnam and causing the war??
Rei
QUOTE (Kewell7 @ Jun 19 2004, 09:18 AM)
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Jun 19 2004, 08:27 AM)
QUOTE (fujisan_8 @ Jun 19 2004, 08:17 AM)
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Jun 19 2004, 08:12 AM)
QUOTE (fujisan_8 @ Jun 19 2004, 07:59 AM)
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Jun 19 2004, 07:17 AM)
What do you think? Any statistics to back it up?

I don't think this is a good topic or indicator...

What basis can one base this on? One thing, look at our country, its well...

$hit.

I'm talking about the Vietnamese intelligence, not how the country is doing.

Yeah if we were smart enough then ouir country wouldn't be backward.

Intelligence...its a very abstract topic and since you wrote compared to mother Asians...taht is a topic looking for a flame war...

Honestly all humans are intelligent...

Please define some constraints...

I don't get, what does our intelligence have to do with our country being backward?

I only blame the Chinese, French and Americans for the present state of Vietnam.

I don't think you should blame other countrie's for one countries state of affairs. If that is the case, shouldn't you blame your own countrymen like Ho Chi Minh for trying to reunify Vietnam and causing the war??

You are right Kewell7, the only people that should really be blamed are the leaders.

Vietnam would be a better country if the communist are out of power, they are the only thing that is holding us back. bawling.gif

But sooner or later we will get it back!!!!
vIeTpRidEs_wOrLdWiDe
Vietnam is getting better and better every single day , fuk those who are against Vietnamese , wait and see
Rei
QUOTE (vIeTpRidEs_wOrLdWiDe @ Jun 19 2004, 10:09 AM)
Vietnam is getting better and better every single day , fuk those who are against Vietnamese , wait and see

Yeah fu-k all those fu-kers, they need to get the fu-k out.

Or we gonna kick them in the ballz kick.gif
Byron
The country ain't doing THAT bad. The poverty rate is like what? 29% Compared to other countries that didn't have any wars or economic sanctions like the Phillipines which have their poverty levels at 40%.

29% poverty level isn't bad for an isolationist country that couldn't trade until recently.

Look at China and India, they are both 3rd world countries but their people are by no means morons.

Yes intelligence plays a factor in how well developed a country is, but there is also the luck factor which may ruin a country.

Well if you look at the stats of the Official Mathematics Olympiad, Vietnam ranks 2nd, 3rd, or 4th every year and is the 2nd highest asian country after China, not bad for a country that has economic sanctions on it.
PervertBurger
QUOTE
I only blame the Chinese, French and Americans for the present state of Vietnam.


Yeah. Okay.
I think it has a lot to do with you guys being a Communist state..correctme if you guys arenn't i'm just going by what I read at Lonely Planet.

http://www.lonelyplanet.com/destinations/s...t_asia/vietnam/
Rei
QUOTE (Byron @ Jun 19 2004, 10:34 AM)
The country ain't doing THAT bad. The poverty rate is like what? 29% Compared to other countries that didn't have any wars or economic sanctions like the Phillipines which have their poverty levels at 40%.

29% poverty level isn't bad for an isolationist country that couldn't trade until recently.

Look at China and India, they are both 3rd world countries but their people are by no means morons.

Yes intelligence plays a factor in how well developed a country is, but there is also the luck factor which may ruin a country.

Well if you look at the stats of the Official Mathematics Olympiad, Vietnam ranks 2nd, 3rd, or 4th every year and is the 2nd highest asian country after China, not bad for a country that has economic sanctions on it.

HAHAHAHA

It's like you mentioned that maths stuff 100 times already.

All the asians are good at maths man embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif

you have to define what smartness really is before you can answer this question
Byron
I don't know.
Rei
QUOTE (Byron @ Jun 19 2004, 10:38 AM)
QUOTE (PervertBurger @ Jun 19 2004, 10:35 AM)
QUOTE
I only blame the Chinese, French and Americans for the present state of Vietnam.


Yeah. Okay.
I think it has a lot to do with you guys being a Communist state..correctme if you guys arenn't i'm just going by what I read at Lonely Planet.

http://www.lonelyplanet.com/destinations/s...t_asia/vietnam/

Well the Chinese I don't blame since they left over a thousand years ago. But I do blame the French for colonizing it which led to the Vietnam War. If no French then there would be no Communist who had to defeat them.

Also blame Vietnamese Catholics for inviting the French over to colonize the country.

The only people you should really blame are the commies...........
RockHeart
NQSH!!!! You are smart like a Nasty Ghost Ho Chi Minh Dog Eater!!! embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif
Rei
QUOTE (RockHeart @ Jun 19 2004, 10:43 AM)
NQSH!!!! You are smart like a Nasty Ghost Ho Chi Minh Dog Eater!!! embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif

LOL Flame bait

RockHeart is gonna get hammered embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif
devilish
..delete
khuanam
QUOTE
Also blame Vietnamese Catholics for inviting the French over to colonize the country


Byron u better stop with that Vietnamese Catholic thing.. Im a Vietnamese Catholic u have anything against me? Its ok if u dont like Vietnamese Catholic, but dont show it to everyone, keep it for yourself i dont go around and say i hate other religion ( yes i did say i hated muslems in another topic, but i meant those fundamentic ones).. In the end those Vietnamese Catholics are Vietnamese just like u, just with another belief....
dalawapo
^ hey, i'd like to know if vietnamese were buddhist before chinese influence? were they animist?
Byron
Hmmmmm
RockHeart
well!!! I would to believe on the Buddhist and Catholic religion. They are so good advice to all human been. But i hate Christain religion...Because its liar and cheat too much...Its teaching the people doing the wrong way...
lthv22
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Jun 19 2004, 07:17 AM)
What do you think? Any statistics to back it up?

NQSH, you put everyone in such a predicament bringing up this topic.
Very INSENSITIVE. Ask a moderator to close it off before it get worst.
Trust me on this one.

Hai chữ trong tiếng Việt : khiêm tốn
vn1234
Yes Buddhism was in VN before the Chinese took over, actually the first contact that China had with Buddhism was from VN, not India, though China wasn't too fond of Buddhism back then and only until Bodhi Dharma from India a few hundred years later did China have a more prevalent side of Buddhism. What's "animist" - I googled it and found weird results?

QUOTE (fujisan 8)
Yeah if we were smart enough then ouir country wouldn't be backward.


Our country is not backward. I would think that to look upon VN as being backward is not very smart. You have to take into consideration our history through a span of over 4000 years to see truly why VN is VN today. Firstly with the Communists, you could say it was the reaction to French rule. During a period of colonialization, such a notion similar to democracy could never ever break through - the French would just squish any voting since they were the controling "colonizers".

By not "following" a larger international power doesn't mean we are dumb, infact I prefer it that way. I would not like the future of VN to be depend on a foreign nation. As long as VN is improving (which it is) in her own ways and is the one to make the calls, that is ok. Canada piggy backs on the US dollar, so when the US starts going downhill, we can't do anything but follow - Canada is stuck. When the US is in war (like now) our Prime Minister can't really say "No" because of this piggy-back situation, Canada sometimes is seen as an economic puppet of the US. I wouldn't want VN to be like that.

Japan and Korea are rich nations compared to VN, but they also have a great "influential hand" behind them. If the US tells us to do something we don't like, we can just say screw you that's not what our people want. Japan and Korea are in more difficult situations. Also after the war, our currecny is so inflated that we can't afford current technology in micro-biology and nano-tech from different nations. We learn what is good from the west, but we do not adapt immediately. Speed is not an indication of intelligence. VN has a spirit and moral base that we can see tends to diminish with more developed nations, so that is why VN takes her time. For example, if VN embraced the internet like the way the west does (with all its chatting, porn, time wasting, etc) it would not have counter-measures to educate a nation on proper responsibility. TV is another example. If TV were like the MTV stuff over here, our children would be immediately affected. Time allows for observation (though being too slow is not good either).

VN is not backward at all, we should not look on the current state of VN unless we take into account the complete history of our nation. If we want to see how much "improvement" we can achieve economically, simply look at the turn-over rate that VN has achieved after the war in the current situation that VN sits in. Once you look at the "change" instead of the "state", then you can see VN is indeed amazingly fast and not slow as you think.
lthv22
QUOTE (Kewell7 Posted: Jun 19 2004 @ 09:18 AM)
I don't think you should blame other countrie's for one countries state of affairs.

Totally agree with you! beerchug.gif

QUOTE (Kewell7 Posted: Jun 19 2004 @ 09:18 AM)
shouldn't you blame your own countrymen like Ho Chi Minh for trying to reunify Vietnam and causing the war??

NO! "NO" is my final answer. We never blame on someone with intrinsically good intention. Beside, the discussion of this man is too profound and need in depth to discuss in order to get a good understanding. It's off topic, so I stop here.
vn1234
Rockheart and Byron seem to get along very well!
lthv22
QUOTE (vn1234 @ Jun 19 2004, 01:26 PM)
Rockheart and Byron seem to get along very well!

Once the love birds got over the period of adjustment, things look promising. biggrin.gif
It's like a love-hate relationship they're in. Once the hate is out in the open, there's only love baby. embarassedlaugh.gif
Adwaregator
Not viet or anything but it just matters on your parents and your peers when you're growing up doesn't it? If you're motivated and get the good responses from your friends and family you'll want to achieve more. It's not like just because you're a particular race you're going to be smarter then another, it all depends on how much you try and your environment. Also about the whole "modernizing" aspect, I think you lose too much culture when you try to adopt "western" society. It shouldn't be that hard to become modernize and keep your culture. I mean asian cultures are very restrictive and that's partly the reason so many asian cultures view america as so "cool" and we're losing our traditions....
supernovasp
QUOTE (vn1234 @ Jun 19 2004, 01:21 PM)
Yes Buddhism was in VN before the Chinese took over, actually the first contact that China had with Buddhism was from VN, not India, though China wasn't too fond of Buddhism back then and only until Bodhi Dharma from India a few hundred years later did China have a more prevalent side of Buddhism. What's "animist" - I googled it and found weird results?

Any proofs? Most of "Kinh phat" are translated from chinese. Unlike other Southeast Asian, we follow Mahayana Buddhism which China was the main "distrbutor" to its sino-influenced countries : Japan, Korea, and Vietnam. Also, Buddhism didn't even flourish in Chinese domination time, but in the Ly dynasty.

Unless we follow Theravāda Buddhism, then your statement would be reasonable
supernovasp
QUOTE (fujisan_8 @ Jun 19 2004, 09:09 AM)
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Jun 19 2004, 08:27 AM)
QUOTE (fujisan_8 @ Jun 19 2004, 08:17 AM)
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Jun 19 2004, 08:12 AM)
QUOTE (fujisan_8 @ Jun 19 2004, 07:59 AM)
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Jun 19 2004, 07:17 AM)
What do you think? Any statistics to back it up?

I don't think this is a good topic or indicator...

What basis can one base this on? One thing, look at our country, its well...

$hit.

I'm talking about the Vietnamese intelligence, not how the country is doing.

Yeah if we were smart enough then ouir country wouldn't be backward.

Intelligence...its a very abstract topic and since you wrote compared to mother Asians...taht is a topic looking for a flame war...

Honestly all humans are intelligent...

Please define some constraints...

I don't get, what does our intelligence have to do with our country being backward?

I only blame the Chinese, French and Americans for the present state of Vietnam.

Yes blaming shows how intelligence we Viets are... icon_rolleyes.gif

Intelligence and backwardness...if we had the intelligence we would have properly managed our country....the intelligence to adopt Western technology and improve Vietnam...just like the Japanese and Koreans did to theirs.

Intelligence is not only about making breakthroughs...all that Science and stuff..it's also about management and quickly reacting to change, able to accept change...etc...that is what I am referring to when I point out the Intelligence-Backward country relationship..

We Viets were not intelligent enough to improve out country.

Peripheral countries like Japan, Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam need to wisen up and ally yourself with the best and leading powers. The first three on the list had succeeded to do so whilst Vietnam unfortunately was not intelligent enough to stop the Communists when it had teh chance. Vietnam needn't Communism ... we would be on par or better than Korea had we seized the chance when we did have it.

Democracy doesn't always work, example : India, however I don't like communism either. Your proof of Korea and Japan are totally laughable, because again as another poster pointed out, they were mostly back-up by the "Great America". Without support of economy after the devastating WWII by the US, Japan would suffer more than Vietnam. Same concept applys to Korea. In the 70s, North Korea's economy was doing very well, as much as the South. After the USSR collasped, North Korea went downhill.

It's all about the back-up countries.
Adwaregator
It's a Republic :P

I was just wondering is Russia backed up by the USA also ?
Byron
QUOTE (Adwaregator @ Jun 19 2004, 02:29 PM)
It's a Republic :P

I was just wondering is Russia backed up by the USA also ?

lol Russia. No. That's why Russia is pretty poor.

Hell Israel was a country in the 40's and look how powerful they are now. It's all because of the U.S pumping billions into it's economy.

If the U.S wanted to they could make African countries rich too.
vn1234
QUOTE (supernovasp @ Jun 19 2004, 12:16 PM)
QUOTE (vn1234 @ Jun 19 2004, 01:21 PM)
Yes Buddhism was in VN before the Chinese took over, actually the first contact that China had with Buddhism was from VN, not India, though China wasn't too fond of Buddhism back then and only until Bodhi Dharma from India a few hundred years later did China have a more prevalent side of Buddhism. What's "animist" - I googled it and found weird results?

Any proofs? Most of "Kinh phat" are translated from chinese. Unlike other Southeast Asian, we follow Mahayana Buddhism which China was the main "distrbutor" to its sino-influenced countries : Japan, Korea, and Vietnam. Also, Buddhism didn't even flourish in Chinese domination time, but in the Ly dynasty.

Unless we follow Theravāda Buddhism, then your statement would be reasonable

Yes lotsa proof, just google something like "Khuong Tang Hoi" or "Khương Tăng Hội"

This has been accepted internationally now and was evident a long time ago in historical circles. The thought that VN Buddhism came from China is very debunked.

Most of the Kinh in VN are translated from China because of the 1000 years of rule. We are influenced by Chinese Buddhism to a certain extent, but Buddhism came to VN before China. Actually yes Buddhism did flourish in the Chinese domination, but it was not revealed much until now because we have recovered new artifacts - Buddhism never waned in VN.

Here take a look at this link presented to the International Association of Asian Studies, held in Houston, TX, February 21-26, 2000 (gotta read the whole thing - including the footnotes please)

here are some blurbs from there:

QUOTE
K’ang Seng-hui was better known as the first Buddhist propagator in southern China (arrived Ch’ien-yeh 248 C.E.),45 by all authorities on Chinese Buddhism. They also believe that K’ang translated the Liu tu chi ching from Sanskrit into Chinese.


K’ang Seng-hui is Khương Tăng Hội

QUOTE
This work is divided into 12 chapters. Ch. I, Buddhism in the Hung Vuong era, relates the transmission of the Buddha's teachings by monk Phat Quang to Chu Dong Tu and his wife Tien Dung, daughter of a Hung king (c. 3rd cent. B.C.E.).


So as you can see as early as the 3rd BCE

QUOTE
Besides re-reading concerned texts as described, Dr. Le Manh That, on many hazardous field trips walked through Vietnam, during 1974-1975, visited remote and unlikely places throughtout the countryside and discovered many rare manuscripts and wood-blocks, by ancient Vietnamese Buddhist authors, lying incognito on dusty shelves of desolete temples or private houses. All in all, he collected more than 300 texts that have never been known to exist before. This discovery helps confirm with concrete proof popular belief that Vietnamese civilization - history, language, literature and Buddhism- existed prior to and independently from Chinese civilization. This should change all that has been written about the history of Vietnam in general and of Vietnamese Buddhism in particular. These texts are still preserved intact in his study, awaiting attention and interest from scholars worldwide.


QUOTE
These works, including introductions, translations, annotations and analytical commentaries on these Ch'an Masters' classical texts, should be known to and shared by scholars worldwide. Their existence proves that there is no paucity of Buddhist activity or literature during the 15th-19th centuries as always claimed.

Many more Buddhist personalities are discovered, especially those living in the 15th-18th centuries during which time Confucianism is thought to have been favoured over Buddhism by the ruling powers.


http://www.quangduc.net/English/0202buddhisminvietnam.html
supernovasp
QUOTE (vn1234 @ Jun 19 2004, 02:39 PM)
QUOTE (supernovasp @ Jun 19 2004, 12:16 PM)
QUOTE (vn1234 @ Jun 19 2004, 01:21 PM)
Yes Buddhism was in VN before the Chinese took over, actually the first contact that China had with Buddhism was from VN, not India, though China wasn't too fond of Buddhism back then and only until Bodhi Dharma from India a few hundred years later did China have a more prevalent side of Buddhism. What's "animist" - I googled it and found weird results?

Any proofs? Most of "Kinh phat" are translated from chinese. Unlike other Southeast Asian, we follow Mahayana Buddhism which China was the main "distrbutor" to its sino-influenced countries : Japan, Korea, and Vietnam. Also, Buddhism didn't even flourish in Chinese domination time, but in the Ly dynasty.

Unless we follow Theravāda Buddhism, then your statement would be reasonable

Yes lotsa proof, just google something like "Khuong Tang Hoi" or "Khương Tăng Hội"

This has been accepted internationally now and was evident a long time ago in historical circles. The thought that VN Buddhism came from China is very debunked.

Most of the Kinh in VN are translated from China because of the 1000 years of rule. We are influenced by Chinese Buddhism to a certain extent, but Buddhism came to VN before China. Actually yes Buddhism did flourish in the Chinese domination, but it was not revealed much until now because we have recovered new artifacts - Buddhism never waned in VN.

Here take a look at this link presented to the International Association of Asian Studies, held in Houston, TX, February 21-26, 2000 (gotta read the whole thing - including the footnotes please)

here are some blurbs from there:

QUOTE
K’ang Seng-hui was better known as the first Buddhist propagator in southern China (arrived Ch’ien-yeh 248 C.E.),45 by all authorities on Chinese Buddhism. They also believe that K’ang translated the Liu tu chi ching from Sanskrit into Chinese.


K’ang Seng-hui is Khương Tăng Hội

QUOTE
This work is divided into 12 chapters. Ch. I, Buddhism in the Hung Vuong era, relates the transmission of the Buddha's teachings by monk Phat Quang to Chu Dong Tu and his wife Tien Dung, daughter of a Hung king (c. 3rd cent. B.C.E.).


So as you can see as early as the 3rd BCE

QUOTE
Besides re-reading concerned texts as described, Dr. Le Manh That, on many hazardous field trips walked through Vietnam, during 1974-1975, visited remote and unlikely places throughtout the countryside and discovered many rare manuscripts and wood-blocks, by ancient Vietnamese Buddhist authors, lying incognito on dusty shelves of desolete temples or private houses. All in all, he collected more than 300 texts that have never been known to exist before. This discovery helps confirm with concrete proof popular belief that Vietnamese civilization - history, language, literature and Buddhism- existed prior to and independently from Chinese civilization. This should change all that has been written about the history of Vietnam in general and of Vietnamese Buddhism in particular. These texts are still preserved intact in his study, awaiting attention and interest from scholars worldwide.


QUOTE
These works, including introductions, translations, annotations and analytical commentaries on these Ch'an Masters' classical texts, should be known to and shared by scholars worldwide. Their existence proves that there is no paucity of Buddhist activity or literature during the 15th-19th centuries as always claimed.

Many more Buddhist personalities are discovered, especially those living in the 15th-18th centuries during which time Confucianism is thought to have been favoured over Buddhism by the ruling powers.


http://www.quangduc.net/English/0202buddhisminvietnam.html

But he's chinese :S. I am very confused by your proof.

Also how do they know that "history, language, literature and Buddhism" existed before Chinese domination, if there were no hard-proof of vietnamese own writing before Chunho or Hanzi.

Also as I pointed out Buddhism didn't flourish in China, so where and how they can translate the "kinh" from China?
Adwaregator
Should just make a new topic about religion :-D

Israel is like the USA of the middle east now hehe. Although it can't free itself from American aide now that's it has "developed"
Kulong
supernovasp
LOL on the map, they include Laos and Champa as Vietnam.

Anyway, Vietnamese like Chinese also worship gods, heroes, and ancestors. WE also have temples dedicate to elephants and whales.
Johannjs
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Jun 19 2004, 07:17 AM)
What do you think? Any statistics to back it up?

I've recently read in an OECD report that nowadays Vietnamese children performed better in literacy (understanding what they read) and have better academic achiements than nowadays German and Japanese. I can't find that report now.

QUOTE
http://www.ed.gov/pubs/USCaseStudy/chapter3b.html

Academic achievement followed racial and ethnic lines. The children of recent immigrants from Vietnam, Russia, and India performed better in classes at Uptown High than those from other racial and ethnic groups. Vietnamese students, in particular, performed well. In fact, Vietnamese students comprised most of the students taking advanced-placement chemistry and calculus classes and the honor roll at Uptown High contained mostly Vietnamese surnames.

Although Vietnamese students struggled in other subjects that were more focused on English language skills, according to the college counselor at Uptown High, the typically scored above the 95th percentile in math and science. But they scored below the 25th in English on the college entrance examinations. Incidentally, the counselor added that these low English scores were not an obstacle to Vietnamese students being accepted at major national universities.

In interviews with students and teachers, we were told that Vietnamese students at Uptown, along with students from India, were referred to by other students as "geeks", a term similar to "bookworm" but with a more derogatory connotation.


I also know that children of Vietnamese descent are considered very bright pupils (always among the top group) in France, that they do extremely well also in other European countries. But probably Vietnamese youths in Vietnam, though stuying in less favorable conditions, work even harder!

So, if being smart means hard working, then we are! Vietnamese people are inventive, but I think they need to work in better conditions at home.

We've got also 1 Nobel Prize (guess for what?) but declined it...

You might want to be our next Nobel Prize winner - in economics? or statistics?!

Have a look at this.
http://ed.sjtu.edu.cn/rank/rank-Asia.mht
Kulong
QUOTE (supernovasp @ Jun 19 2004, 01:51 PM)
LOL on the map, they include Laos and Champa as Vietnam.

That isn't a political map, which is why borders aren't drawn. Another reason why the borders aren't drawn is because the spreading of Buddhism took place over centuries. During this time, many nations borders shifted. The names of each nation is written at their modern day location for reference.

I don't know about Champa but I don't see how you assume Laos was included as part of Vietnam. sure.gif
khuanam
QUOTE
To Khaunam, well Communists in Vietnam are Vietnaemse too, but how come fellow Vietnamese get to insult them but I can't insult Vietnamese catholics even though they were responsible for some bad things in Vietnam as well. But instead I get this: "But they are also Vietnamese." Well aren't the Communist Vietnamese still deep inside Vietnamese as well?


Yes indeed Communist Vietnamese is also Vietnamese.. But u make it as Catholics are all to blame.. It would be so easy just to blame it on Catholics.. But remember that Vietnam is majority Buddishm! So why dont u insult other kinds? i have notice u only go after Catholics..and i find that offensive.. There is a difference in bashing somes ideoligy and bashing someones religion.
vn1234
QUOTE (supernovasp @ Jun 19 2004, 12:44 PM)
But he's chinese :S. I am very confused by your proof.

Also how do they know that "history, language, literature and Buddhism" existed before Chinese domination, if there were no hard-proof of vietnamese own writing before Chunho or Hanzi.

Also as I pointed out Buddhism didn't flourish in China, so where and how they can translate the "kinh" from China?

Sorry I didn't clarify heheh - Khương Tăng Hội is the first Monk with Viet Blood - hes not Chinese, the usage of Chinese naming in this document was for international purposes - remember this document was presented to an international panel. Khuong Tang Hoi was son to an Indian father and a Viet mother.

About history language and literature - some sources are from Han records made by Han scholars - that's the irony - a lot our texts are destroy but the Han kept theirs and they recorded what happened when they visited us. Also remember that Dr. Le Manh That has found over 300 artifacts never before seen in this world, so the sources that you have read from are probably not a part of the new discoveries. The newer evidence is from Viet sources when Dr. Le Manh That traveled the country side.

I agree that Buddhism didn't flourish in China during that time, thus the Kinh was translated from India - Buddhism met VN by route of sea from the source, so Khuong Tang Hoi translated a lot from pali and sanskit, not from Chinese sources. Later on during the Chinese rule of 1000 years, the texts were destroyed and the Chinese versions were translated - thus what you see now with Chinese/Han scriptures in Kinh.

Also that map is old - the book I'm reading and new findings are within these foew years. Dr. Le Mant That was working during the 1974-75 era when he was put in jail by the govnt for protesting for religious freedom - he was set free in 1998, so he has been through a time freeze and the historical community had to wait.


Remember dudes - this is newer stuff, so all your previous knowledge, and that map, is debunked
TrueViet
QUOTE (RockHeart @ Jun 19 2004, 10:43 AM)
NQSH!!!! You are smart like a Nasty Ghost Ho Chi Minh Dog Eater!!! embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif embarassedlaugh.gif

And let me guess rockHeart, you are smarter than the dumbest person? beerchug.gif
supernovasp
QUOTE (vn1234 @ Jun 19 2004, 03:21 PM)
About history language and literature - some sources are from Han records made by Han scholars - that's the irony - a lot our texts are destroy but the Han kept theirs and they recorded what happened when they visited us. Also remember that Dr. Le Manh That has found over 300 artifacts never before seen in this world, so the sources that you have read from are probably not a part of the new discoveries. The newer evidence is from Viet sources when Dr. Le Manh That traveled the country side.

Any pictures please.

As far as I know, we haven't found any writing systems before sinicization, or if found, it would probably is still undeciphered. Unless you have pictures and proofs, I still don't believe it.
vn1234
Like I said this is new stuff - so I myself can't find any on the net because the to mass populace this isn't available:

If you get a chance though you can look into this:

QUOTE
The Luc do tap kinh is translated from an original text written in old-style Vietnamese because it comprises a number of languistic structures not in accordance with Chinese grammatical style, thus provides a framework for re-constructing the language of Vietnam that was in use more than 2,000 years ago. This is truly an invaluable contribution to Vietnamese civilization and for linguists who are interested in the origin of Vietnamese literature and linguistics.


Khuong Tang Hoi toan tap. 44. Vol. I. VanHanh University Press, 1975. 615p

So sorry I have no pics at the moment, since this relatively new stuff so its up to you what you think. I have much to read through so I will post more when I learn more.
Clean
QUOTE (Johannjs @ Jun 19 2004, 01:53 PM)
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Jun 19 2004, 07:17 AM)
What do you think? Any statistics to back it up?

I've recently read in an OECD report that nowadays Vietnamese children performed better in literacy (understanding what they read) and have better academic achiements than nowadays German and Japanese. I can't find that report now.

QUOTE
http://www.ed.gov/pubs/USCaseStudy/chapter3b.html

Academic achievement followed racial and ethnic lines. The children of recent immigrants from Vietnam, Russia, and India performed better in classes at Uptown High than those from other racial and ethnic groups. Vietnamese students, in particular, performed well. In fact, Vietnamese students comprised most of the students taking advanced-placement chemistry and calculus classes and the honor roll at Uptown High contained mostly Vietnamese surnames.

Although Vietnamese students struggled in other subjects that were more focused on English language skills, according to the college counselor at Uptown High, the typically scored above the 95th percentile in math and science. But they scored below the 25th in English on the college entrance examinations. Incidentally, the counselor added that these low English scores were not an obstacle to Vietnamese students being accepted at major national universities.

In interviews with students and teachers, we were told that Vietnamese students at Uptown, along with students from India, were referred to by other students as "geeks", a term similar to "bookworm" but with a more derogatory connotation.


I also know that children of Vietnamese descent are considered very bright pupils (always among the top group) in France, that they do extremely well also in other European countries. But probably Vietnamese youths in Vietnam, though stuying in less favorable conditions, work even harder!

So, if being smart means hard working, then we are! Vietnamese people are inventive, but I think they need to work in better conditions at home.

We've got also 1 Nobel Prize (guess for what?) but declined it...

You might want to be our next Nobel Prize winner - in economics? or statistics?!

Have a look at this.
http://ed.sjtu.edu.cn/rank/rank-Asia.mht

Someone declined a nobel prize? Who're you referring to? Never knew. (currently clueless)
vn1234
Le Duc Tho for the Nobel Peace Prize, but declined

QUOTE
Vietnamese politician and corecipient in 1973 (with Henry Kissinger) of the Nobel Prize for Peace, which he declined.  Le Duc Tho was one of the founders of the Indochinese Communist Party in 1930. For his political activities he was imprisoned by the French in 1930-36 and 1939-44. After his second release he returned to Hanoi in 1945 and helped lead the Viet Minh, the Vietnamese independence organization, as well as a revived communist party called the Vietnam Workers' Party. He was the senior Viet Minh official in southern Vietnam until the Geneva Accords of 1954. From 1955 he was a member of the Politburo of the Vietnam Workers' Party, or the Communist Party of Vietnam, as it was renamed in 1976. During the Vietnam War (1955-75) Tho oversaw the Viet Cong insurgency that began against the South Vietnamese government in the late 1950s. He carried out most of his duties during the war while in hiding in South Vietnam.    Tho is best known for his part in the cease-fire of 1973, when he served as special adviser to the North Vietnamese delegation to the Paris Peace Conferences in 1968-73. He eventually became his delegation's principal spokesman, in which capacity he negotiated the cease-fire agreement that led to the withdrawal of the last American troops from South Vietnam. It was for this accomplishment that he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. Tho oversaw the North Vietnamese offensive that overthrew the South Vietnamese government in 1975, and he played a similar role in the first stages of Vietnam's invasion of Cambodia in 1978. He remained a member of the Politburo until 1986.


http://www.nobel-winners.com/Peace/le_duc_tho.html
TDscorpion
QUOTE
Someone declined a nobel prize? Who're you referring to? Never knew. (currently clueless)


Born: October 14, 1911 Original name: Phan Dinh Khai AKA Le Duc Tho
Place of birth: Nam Ha, Vietnam
Residence: Democratic Republic of Viet Nam
(Declined the prize on grounds that his country was still not at peace.) 1973
tattra
QUOTE (vn1234 @ Jun 19 2004, 05:45 PM)
Le Duc Tho for the Nobel Peace Prize, but declined

Was he supposed to share one with Henry Kissinger ?
holamon
QUOTE (tattra @ Jun 19 2004, 04:49 PM)
QUOTE (vn1234 @ Jun 19 2004, 05:45 PM)
Le Duc Tho for the Nobel Peace Prize, but declined

Was he supposed to share one with Henry Kissinger ?

I think so.
Clean
Thanks guys for the info on the nobel prize... Not too often do people decline the Nobel prize though, i'm kind of curious on how many people have declined them throughout the years now. But i guess i'll do that research on my own.

On a different note, that article on buddhism is also pretty interesting. It offers a new perspective on Vietnamese buddhism, and thus to a large degree, Vietnamese civilization.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.