QUOTE(TrashCleaner @ Dec 9 2006, 12:57 AM) [snapback]2554099[/snapback]
Từ "ḥn ngọc Viễn Đông" không nên dùng bởi v́ thực ra Sài g̣n cách đây mấy chục năm vẫn chưa thể bằng được nhiều thành phố trong vùng Đông Nam Á chứ chưa nói đến toàn Đông Á. . Người Phi-líp-pin cũng gọi thủ đô của họ là ḥn ngọc Viễn Đông, cả Malayxia cũng thế. Phải biết nh́n người mà biết ta, tự hào th́ phải có cơ sở vững chắc. Phải có lập trường và chứng cứ th́ nói mới thuyết phục, chứ cứ hùa theo nhau nói ḥn ngọc này ḥn ngọc nọ th́ không nên.
Nếu có ǵ đáng tự hào th́ Việt Nam nên tự hào về nền văn hóa của ḿnh. Chứ kinh tế th́ chưa bao giờ, và cũng chưa chắc sẽ có thể tự hào được. Tin báo đưa th́ cũng chỉ là để động viên toàn dân làm kinh tế mà thôi.
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/11/17/new...igon.php?page=2It was in the 1860s that French colonists laid out the grids and began to build the shady city that came to be known as the Pearl of the Orient. City officials are now redefining it for the next century or more, and the question is how much of old Saigon will remain.
"A city is like a human being," Tat said. "It needs to have a past. There is a saying in Vietnam that even if the pages are frayed, a book must still have its spine."
Already the city's pages are fraying.
As Vietnam's economy opened fitfully over the past decade and a half, developers seized their moment to coarsen some of the elegance of the city center with faceless office buildings. The skyline was fouled with undistinguished structures including two dozen incongruous skyscrapers.
But projects like this are now the subject of debate, most recently a proposed 53-story tower that would devour a park and overshadow one of the city's landmarks, the central market.
At one point, a Taiwanese developer was offering $500 million for the site, a very hard sum to turn down. And there are some officials who like the aesthetics of the idea, a landmark for the new century, signaling the city's thrust into the future.
The city's emerging plan calls for most tall buildings to be concentrated in the new center to be created across the river. But that is still years away, and the demands of developers, along with the city's hunger for modernity, may overwhelm aesthetics.
Bold plans for transportation systems and for underground parking garages are only at the starting point - too late to avoid the traffic gridlock that has almost overnight become a new feature of the city.
According to the city's figures, there are 400,000 cars on the roads, along with three million small motorbikes. As the economy surges, the balance will tilt toward autos, and using a rule of thumb, each car waiting at a stoplight will take up the space of six motorbikes.
It is much easier to start fresh, of course, and Ho Chi Minh City is blessed with broad areas for expansion. For city planners, Saigon South is a model for the future, a 3,100-hectare, or 7,600- acre, project that is managed by a Taiwanese company, Central Trading and Development Group.
A fully furnished city, it will come complete with shopping malls, hotels, schools, hospitals, scientific institutes, food courts, a small golf course, offices, a convention center, an industrial park, apartments and housing developments.
Neat, clean and orderly, it is a futuristic Saigon, leached of its history.
The fresh face of Saigon South is probably historically inevitable, uncannily similar to the version of a modern Vietnam that was created by refugees as Little Saigon in Southern California.
In its newer districts, it might be said, big Saigon is being transformed into a big Little Saigon