QUOTE(erla @ Jun 8 2007, 06:30 AM) [snapback]2989986[/snapback]
Off-Topic
Zaw-Gyi,I know about how the Thais treated the Shans that fled to Thailand(and other people too),but don't you know that Thailand is also virtually like a dumping ground for these illegal immigrants and all the crimes and society problems that they bring with them ? Anyway,Thailand being a centre location have to help these people too,but Thai should also seriously adopt the policy of Singapore,where it's very harsh to illegal immigrants.
On-Topic
SHAN should belongs to Thailand,go do a survey on them and see whether they feels more affilated with the burmese than with the Thais.I've been to there before,and all I can said is that our culture are so similar,and they adores Thais,no kidding. They consider themselves one part of us too.The Burma Junta should started treating them right now,if not then I think Thailand would do a much better job than them.
Come to think of that,if we really want a state expansion,the Mon should also join us too,consider our culture similarities and how much we've been helping them.
Hi Erla <3
i find your arguments so adorably cute but you've been brainwashed into thinking this because because you have poor experience of anything other than Mons or Shan in your country either flattering you with how similar your cultures are or from your own limited observations .
Which part of the MASSIVE Shan state did you actually get to ? KengTung ? , Taung-Gyi ? , Hsipaw ? Mong Meit ? . How many Shan do you actually know ? How many did you actually speak to ? What kind of Shan were they ? What socio-economic group did these Shan belong to ?
it's always the privelege of the poor to feel oppressed - especially when it is true - but also to blame things on ethnic or cultural differences . These differences usually don't matter when there is wealth . I don't remember the majority Shan states repeatedly sideing with AYutthaya over their 1000 yr old history . When Burma was rich and powerful they affiliated with BUrma and often CHina - even KengTung the eastern most and least Burman state did so ( hence dozens of marriages between Burmese royalty and Shan aristocracy over many many centuries )
What similarities are there with Siamese culture ?? We ( Thailand and Burma ) share a massive border so surely it makes sense that there is blurring of cultures and ethnicities there also given that there were no firm boundaries before the British imposed them . What cultural similarities do you share with the Mon that makes Mon more Thai than Burmese ? Mon are MOn but if they are similar to anyone then its to the BUrmans . Everyone knows this . Mons that deny this do so only because of perceived hurt . If you want to give them a homeland why not carve one out of Thailand for them . The Mon state was created in the 1970s out of recognition that some Mon felt very Mon and wanted a homeland ( i know it's not ideal but most Mon have become Burmans over the years - what do you want to do about that ? reconvert them ? - what's done is done and coercion is not only by force but by wealth )
The essence of Mon is also that of Burmese ( we are more like Mon than Thai - in terms of culture Mon and Burman cultures are derivations of each other and have been for a 1000 years ) Why do you guys deny your Khmer heritage and only remember your MOn ? On a world map we too are culturally similar to you compared to say the Malay , Indo , Flips or Vietnamese : does that mean we join with Thailand too ? ( maybe we should as junior partner to Siamese supremacy - ha ha )
AS for the Shan , whereas I agree that the eastern fringes especially KengTung ( which incidentally can also be called Chiang Tong ) was created as an offshoot of Chiang Mai by Lanna royalty and therefore feel affiliated with Thailand becasue Lanna is NOW annexed by Siam, I don't think you realise how big the Shan state is or how different the the Shans really are even to each other .
There are Lanna-ised Shans as well as BUrmanised -Shans and Sinofied - Shan ( BUT NO SIAMISED SHAN - got it ? ) as well as there being 50% of population of the Shan state who ARE NOT SHAN.
The BUrman identity is also not "pure" IT's part Shan , part MOn , part Tibeto-Burman . ( likewise Thais on the whole are part MOn , part Shan , part Khmer ) SO ACTUALLY WE ARE 2/3 RDS THE SAME . Terrible isn't it . We're like brothers who've fallen out because one brother pissed in the other's pint 10 years previously and are now fighting over who's best friends with the other brother .
By simple mathematical calculation the central Burmese are also 1/5 Ayutthayan as thats where your court and 50,000 of your citizens ended up ( never to return but making up about 20% of the population of Ava at the time ) . They became assimilated losing language but adapting Siamese tradition to enrich our society giving it more depth and layer . Do you know we acknowledge that Ramakien influenced our perception of the Ramayana so much ( when the exiled court members adapted to Burmese tastes ) that it has become cherished as our own .
Please stop this bull$hit , playground "we are so similar so we should be friends " and just get on with it sorting out your own issues in Pattani and your dissent in Issan or Surin .
I repeat : This amounts to taking advantage of a weakened state for the mere purposes of state expansion .
If you want cultural similarity look to Lao first then Cambodia . DOn't play this "Shans are so similar to us so should be part of our team" bla bla bla ( part of your team and do what ? provide you with more cheap labour , prostitutes and raw naterials for your Chinese owned industries ?

)
I don't see Shans openly longing to be part of Yunnan or Laos ( to whom cultural similarity is IMHO GREATER. ) This is because poor oppressed people will always go where the MONEY .
Actually word on the street is that eastern Shans do want to unite BUT with Lanna , North Laos , Sipsong Panna and Dehong .
So why not give independence to Lanna ? There are some in Lanna that do want greater autonomy and feel their culture has been butchered by Central Thais and if in the future Laos were to become wealthy or China were to become the wealthiest and strongest nation in the world I can see Lanna wanting to join with Laos and parts of CHina for sure .
I have many relatives in Bangkok who are ethnic Shan and you know what ? They consider themselves BURMESE and travel back and forth all the time . Why ? They are well off .
It's always easy to confuse socio-economic issues with ethno-religious ones . That's the problem in this world.
By your argument , Burma should have Lanna back since from my own observations the culture there is
so similar to our own ( rather than with Siam ) . You've only "owned" Lanna for as long as we did .
My Santa wish is for a democratic stable government in BUrma with nuturing of ethnic ties between the different groups with stability and growth in associated partnership between all SE Asian nations . Once this is achieved and the Shan state can be independent on its own , then a referendum should take place on INDEPENDENCE and being able to go on its own and not to serve as some backwater of Siam ( this is an ethnic Shan - ME speaking )