QUOTE(landsknechts @ Aug 14 2006, 07:27 PM) [snapback]2174976[/snapback]
Ho Chi Minh did not approach communism at first but he approached capitalism U.S for help to remove the French but the anti-communist American rejected him.
In fact, it was the American that backed the French at Dien Bien Phu against our fight for independence.
Anti-communists are scumbags and they'll be remembered as the enemy of Vietnam. Without the communists, today I have to call myself as "Annamese", not Vietnamese. Thank God for the communists, today there is a country called Vietnam, not a colony of France.
Without the Vietnamese Communists, Vietnam is not like what you see today and millions of Vietnamese didn't have to suffer with War. Its more like advanced countries like S. Korea and Singapore.
Phan Chu Trinh was working with diplomatic means to win independence from France and Phan Boi Chau was getting young Vietnameses to learn advanced technology from abroad so when they get back to Vietnam, they can move the country forward once we win independence.
Ho's means were to have revolutions he learned from the Soviets and the Chinese where the poors and the uneducated were bombarded with propagandas and were told that they should uprise and bring the rich and educated down. As evidenced with the Land Reforms and the Cultural Revolution where ancestor, culture, education were denounced and only worship Communism. Bad for the country, bad for the future as evidenced in today Vietnam as a result of this idealogy!
Ho knew damn well that it was unreasonable to ask the US for help. Here's why: firstable, America was paranoid with Communism after WWII and Ho was a world communist agent at the time. It was unreasonalbe to help a communist organization if communist is your new enemy. Secondly, America just gave up thousands(millions?) of their men in liberating the France from the Nazi, what make Ho thinks the US will go against the French.
There are declassified info's on America wanted Vietnam independence from France. America denounced colonialism and wanted pretty much for Vietnam Indepence as you can see thru Pres. Roosevelt's memo:
http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/fdrjs.htmQUOTE
The President [FDR] said that Mr. Churchill was of the opinion that France would be very quickly reconstructed as a strong nation, but he did not personally share this view since he felt that many years of honest labor would be necessary before France would be re-established. He said the first necessity for the French, not only for the Government but the people as well, was to become honest citizens.
Marshal [Josef] Stalin agreed and went on to say that he did not propose to have the Allies shed blood to restore Indochina, for example, to the old French colonial rule. He said that the recent events in the Lebanon [where the French ended their mandate] made public service the first step toward the independence of people who had formerly been colonial subjects. He said that in the war against Japan, in his opinion, that in addition to military missions, it was necessary to fight the Japanese in the political sphere as well, particularly in view of the fact that the Japanese had granted the least nominal independence to certain colonial areas. He repeated that France should not get back Indochina and that the French must pay for their criminal collaboration with Germany.
The President said he was 100% in agreement with Marshal Stalin and remarked that after 100 years of French rule in Indochina, the inhabitants were worse off than they had been before. .
The President continued on the subject of colonial possessions, but he felt it would be better not to discuss the question of India with Mr. Churchill, since the latter had no solution of that question, and merely proposed to defer the entire question to the end of the war.
Marshal Stalin agreed that this was a sore spot with the British.
http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/fdrch.htmQUOTE
I saw Halifax [Lord Halifax, British ambassador to the United States] last week and told him quite frankly that it was perfectly true that I had, for over a year, expressed the opinion that Indo-China should not go back to France but that it should be administered by an international trusteeship. France has had the country-thirty million inhabitants for nearly one hundred years, and the people are worse off than they were at the beginning.
As a matter of interest, I am wholeheartedly supported in this view by Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek [of China] and by Marshal Stalin. I see no reason to play in with the British Foreign Office in this matter. The only reason they seem to oppose it is that they fear the effect it would have on their own possessions and those of the Dutch. They have never liked the idea of trusteeship because it is, in some instances, aimed at future independence. This is true in the case of IndoChina.
Each case must, of course, stand on its own feet, but the case of Indo-China is perfectly clear. France has milked it for one hundred years. The people of IndoChina are entitled to something better than that.
QUOTE
The President [FDR] said he was concerned about the brown people in the East. He said that there are 1,100,000,000 brown people. In many Eastern countries, they are ruled by a handful of whites and they resent it. Our goal must be to help them achieve independence--1 ,100,000,000 potential enemies are dangerous. He said he included the 450,000,000 Chinese in that. He then added, Churchill doesn't understand this.
The President said he thought we might have some difficulties with France in the matter of colonies. I said that I thought that was quite probable and it was also probable the British would use France as a "stalking horse."
I asked the President if he had changed his ideas on French Indo-China as he had expressed them to us at the luncheon with [British secretary of state for the colonies Oliver] Stanley. He said no he had not changed his ideas; that French Indo-China and New Caledonia should be taken from France and put under a trusteeship. The President hesitated a moment and then said--well if we can get the proper pledge from France to assume for herself the obligations of a trustee, then I would agree to France retaining these colonies with the proviso that independence was the ultimate goal. I asked the President if he would settle for self-government. He said no. I asked him if he would settle for dominion status. He said no--it must be independence. He said that is to be the policy and you can quote me in the State Department.
Thanks to Ho for introducing Communism to Vietnam and making friends with the Soviets thus in no way will get help from the US. I really BELIEVE without Ho or the Vietminh, Vietnam will gain Independence anyway sooner or later without much bloodshed. Unfortunately, thanks to Ho, millions suffered thru War and the country fell back hundreds years behind. Today, Vietnam still suffers the consequences of Ho's great move to the introduction of Communism.
Well, thats the past and whatever happened, happened already. Communism is on its few last breaths. Now, its time for young generations to clean Ho's dirty mess. Good luck y'all!!!