Nam Quoc Son Ha
Apr 11 2004, 08:13 PM

LOL just joking.
直隸總督
Apr 11 2004, 08:14 PM
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Apr 11 2004, 09:13 PM)

LOL just joking.

lol........
huaren
Apr 11 2004, 08:14 PM
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Apr 11 2004, 09:13 PM)

LOL just joking.

Hahahahaha!
Nam Quoc Son Ha
Apr 11 2004, 08:28 PM
Hope I didnt' give anyone a heart attack... LOL
DaAznBitcH
Apr 11 2004, 08:50 PM
...................u scared me

..................
KoRn
Apr 11 2004, 09:34 PM
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Apr 11 2004, 09:13 PM)

LOL just joking.

lmao hahahaha nice joke nice aha...
ngo.ngochy
Apr 11 2004, 11:08 PM
Umm.. not funny Chuong

.. my heart almost popped out.. since i never read the news
Nam Quoc Son Ha
Apr 12 2004, 12:14 AM
Practice some common sense people. What would Vietnamese be doing there?
Ben
Apr 12 2004, 01:07 AM
I was like wTF?! Vietnamese too? I better not start seeing more fake topics like this or other people will create one for each section which will result in massive warnings
IORI
Apr 12 2004, 02:01 AM
a) the situation in iraq is not laughing matter
b) don't count ur luck
c) if the time comes you'll be feeling sorry for the people
d) this is serious and so far no hostage has been killed (touch wood)
and
e) there are already hostages from south east asia so anythings possible
Byron
Apr 12 2004, 04:18 AM
I thought it was Vietnamese American hostages. You know like that Vietnamese American soldier who was killed in Iraq who was a son of a boat person there I believe.
drunk_on_tea
Apr 12 2004, 04:33 AM
QUOTE (Byron @ Apr 12 2004, 03:18 AM)
I thought it was Vietnamese American hostages. You know like that Vietnamese American soldier who was killed in Iraq who was a son of a boat person there I believe.
Nice sneaking in that "boat person" bit there.
Byron
Apr 12 2004, 04:56 AM
QUOTE (drunk_on_tea @ Apr 12 2004, 05:33 AM)
QUOTE (Byron @ Apr 12 2004, 03:18 AM)
I thought it was Vietnamese American hostages. You know like that Vietnamese American soldier who was killed in Iraq who was a son of a boat person there I believe.
Nice sneaking in that "boat person" bit there.
And what's wrong with using the phrase "boat person"?
drunk_on_tea
Apr 12 2004, 06:34 AM
QUOTE (Byron @ Apr 12 2004, 03:56 AM)
QUOTE (drunk_on_tea @ Apr 12 2004, 05:33 AM)
QUOTE (Byron @ Apr 12 2004, 03:18 AM)
I thought it was Vietnamese American hostages. You know like that Vietnamese American soldier who was killed in Iraq who was a son of a boat person there I believe.
Nice sneaking in that "boat person" bit there.
And what's wrong with using the phrase "boat person"?
Why would you use it anyway? As if that's his father's identity, a "boat person", as if that's the Vietnamese-American identity, "boat people". His dad is a software consultant, he doesn't make his living relying on a boat.
-Emperor-
Apr 12 2004, 07:23 AM
LOL
Nam Quoc Son Ha
Apr 12 2004, 08:21 AM
You rock drunk_on_tea.
I was just wondering why people are getting so serious over something so trivial? Take things light-heartedly will make you look and feel younger. LOL
Doan Du
Apr 12 2004, 08:40 AM
China ought to send a PLA detachement to Iraq. The Iraqi rebels kidnapped 7 Chinese nationals traveling in Iraq yesterday.
Kulong
Apr 12 2004, 08:46 AM
QUOTE (Doan Du @ Apr 12 2004, 08:40 AM)
China ought to send a PLA detachement to Iraq. The Iraqi rebels kidnapped 7 Chinese nationals traveling in Iraq yesterday.
While PRC should definitely try to get its citizens back, but by sending troops into Iraq, it would only make U.S. happy because China has always been against the illegal invasion of Iraq.
SuPaDuPaFlY
Apr 12 2004, 08:49 AM

Good one. Got me all worried for nothing.
Doan Du
Apr 12 2004, 09:12 AM
QUOTE (Kulong @ Apr 12 2004, 09:46 AM)
QUOTE (Doan Du @ Apr 12 2004, 08:40 AM)
China ought to send a PLA detachement to Iraq. The Iraqi rebels kidnapped 7 Chinese nationals traveling in Iraq yesterday.
While PRC should definitely try to get its citizens back, but by sending troops into Iraq, it would only make U.S. happy because China has always been against the illegal invasion of Iraq.
What if they kill the Chinese hostages? Is China just going to sit there and watch?
Kulong
Apr 12 2004, 09:14 AM
QUOTE (Doan Du @ Apr 12 2004, 09:12 AM)
QUOTE (Kulong @ Apr 12 2004, 09:46 AM)
QUOTE (Doan Du @ Apr 12 2004, 08:40 AM)
China ought to send a PLA detachement to Iraq. The Iraqi rebels kidnapped 7 Chinese nationals traveling in Iraq yesterday.
While PRC should definitely try to get its citizens back, but by sending troops into Iraq, it would only make U.S. happy because China has always been against the illegal invasion of Iraq.
What if they kill the Chinese hostages? Is China just going to sit there and watch?
I didn't say China should do one thing or the other. I am merely pointing out the dilemma China has in its hands...
Doan Du
Apr 12 2004, 09:33 AM
Sending in police rescue squads or Army special operation agents to rescue its own citizens does not equal to getting involved politically and militarily to Iraq. Nor does it contradict current or past Chinese policies and positions with regard to the Iraq invasion.
This would allow the world to see that China is truly a power and to let the people see how awsome the PLA capability is. Otherwise people would just say that the PLA special forces are only for photo opportunity or parade purpose.
Kulong
Apr 12 2004, 09:36 AM
QUOTE (Doan Du @ Apr 12 2004, 09:33 AM)
Sending in police rescue squads or Army special operation agents to rescue its own citizens does not equal to getting involved politically and militarily to Iraq. Nor does it contradict current or past Chinese policies and positions with regard to the Iraq invasion.
This would allow the world to see that China is truly a power and to let the people see how awsome the PLA capability is. Otherwise people would just say that the PLA special forces are only for photo opportunity or parade purpose.
Actually it would be China's advantage for the world to not realize the true capabilities of the PLA. So when a nation, say U.S., decides to invade China, they will underestimate the PLA

jk
But yes you are right. I can't wait until the U.S. media puts a twist on this and makes China look like the bad guy again
Doan Du
Apr 12 2004, 09:50 AM
QUOTE (Kulong @ Apr 12 2004, 10:36 AM)
But yes you are right. I can't wait until the U.S. media puts a twist on this and makes China look like the bad guy again

If those poor Chinese hostages get tortured and burned by the Iraqi rebels, the only people who will end up looking bad are those in the Chinese leadership.
They would come across as uncaring, hesitant, yielding, or whatever other negative attributes associated with incompetency.
Kulong
Apr 12 2004, 09:54 AM
QUOTE (Doan Du @ Apr 12 2004, 09:50 AM)
QUOTE (Kulong @ Apr 12 2004, 10:36 AM)
But yes you are right. I can't wait until the U.S. media puts a twist on this and makes China look like the bad guy again

If those poor Chinese hostages get tortured and burned by the Iraqi rebels, the only people who will end up looking bad are those in the Chinese leadership.
They would come across as uncaring, hesitant, yielding, or whatever other negative attributes associated with incompetency.
I meant if China does send special forces into Iraq to rescue its citizens, the U.S. will surely somehow make China look bad, as it always had.
"Chinese special forces kills Iraqi freedom fighters"...
Doan Du
Apr 12 2004, 10:01 AM
QUOTE (Kulong @ Apr 12 2004, 10:54 AM)
I meant if China does send special forces into Iraq to rescue its citizens, the U.S. will surely somehow make China look bad, as it always had.
"Chinese special forces kills Iraqi freedom fighters"...

Why is China constantly worried about what the US would say about her? And not to do what is right for her own interest?
So the lives of those 7 Fujianese guys might just as well be forsaken? They don't mean anything at all? What does that say to the world? Chinese lives are so cheap that they are equivalent to some insignificant ants that one steps on everyday? Anybody can do anything to Chinese citizens abroad because the government of China is not going to do anything about it?
Kulong
Apr 12 2004, 10:03 AM
QUOTE (Doan Du @ Apr 12 2004, 10:01 AM)
QUOTE (Kulong @ Apr 12 2004, 10:54 AM)
I meant if China does send special forces into Iraq to rescue its citizens, the U.S. will surely somehow make China look bad, as it always had.
"Chinese special forces kills Iraqi freedom fighters"...

Why is China constantly worried about what the US would say about her? And not to do what is right for her own interest?
So the lives of those 7 Fujianese guys might just as well be forsaken? They don't mean anything at all? What does that say to the world? Chinese lives are so cheap that they are equivalent to some insignificant ants that one steps on everyday? Anybody can do anything to Chinese citizens abroad because the government of China is not going to do anything about it?
China is not, I am. I don't represent China

I am not even from China

Actually I am not worried because I know both sides play this game. It's as difficult to find good news about the U.S in China as it is to find good news about China int he U.S.
When did I ever say that the PRC should abandon its own people in Iraq? Why must you keep putting words in my mouth? Do you have some kind of sick fetish?
Doan Du
Apr 12 2004, 10:12 AM
QUOTE (Kulong @ Apr 12 2004, 11:03 AM)
China is not, I am. I don't represent China

I am not even from China

Actually I am not worried because I know both sides play this game. It's as difficult to find good news about the U.S in China as it is to find good news about China int he U.S.
When did I ever say that the PRC should abandon its own people in Iraq? Why must you keep putting words in my mouth? Do you have some kind of sick fetish?
I am not putting words on your mouth. That is a direct result of the policies that you are advocating or suggesting that China adopts.
Is that a fetish? I'm still waiting to see where all the internet porn sites that you want to return to. Where are they, Kulong?
Byron
Apr 12 2004, 10:16 AM
Aren't they Chinese living in Jordon? So they are Jordon civilians not Chinese civilians, so I don't know if the Chinese would want to help Jordon civilians even though they are of Chinese descent. China would probably save them, if they want to save their image because most of the world believes them as Chinese citizens so not saving them would make it look like they don't care about their people.
Kulong
Apr 12 2004, 10:27 AM
QUOTE (Doan Du @ Apr 12 2004, 10:12 AM)
I am not putting words on your mouth. That is a direct result of the policies that you are advocating or suggesting that China adopts.
How many times do I need to tell you, I am not suggesting China to do one thing or another. Why is it so difficult to get that through your head? It's like talking to a wall
Doan Du
Apr 12 2004, 10:32 AM
QUOTE (Kulong @ Apr 12 2004, 11:27 AM)
QUOTE (Doan Du @ Apr 12 2004, 10:12 AM)
I am not putting words on your mouth. That is a direct result of the policies that you are advocating or suggesting that China adopts.
How many times do I need to tell you, I am not suggesting China to do one thing or another. Why is it so difficult to get that through your head? It's like talking to a wall
Fine. Doing nothing in this case is doing something (let those hostages die in vain) just in case you haven't figured it out yet.
Kulong
Apr 12 2004, 10:34 AM
QUOTE (Doan Du @ Apr 12 2004, 10:32 AM)
QUOTE (Kulong @ Apr 12 2004, 11:27 AM)
QUOTE (Doan Du @ Apr 12 2004, 10:12 AM)
I am not putting words on your mouth. That is a direct result of the policies that you are advocating or suggesting that China adopts.
How many times do I need to tell you, I am not suggesting China to do one thing or another. Why is it so difficult to get that through your head? It's like talking to a wall
Fine. Doing nothing in this case is doing something (let those hostages die in vain) just in case you haven't figured it out yet.
OMG...

Did I say that China should do nothing? Like I said, I am not suggesting anything at all. In my very first post, I merely pointed out some issues. I then even agreed that the PRC government should send PLA special forces into Iraq to rescue these hostages. What is your problem?
Doan Du
Apr 12 2004, 10:39 AM
QUOTE (Kulong @ Apr 12 2004, 11:34 AM)
QUOTE (Doan Du @ Apr 12 2004, 10:32 AM)
QUOTE (Kulong @ Apr 12 2004, 11:27 AM)
QUOTE (Doan Du @ Apr 12 2004, 10:12 AM)
I am not putting words on your mouth. That is a direct result of the policies that you are advocating or suggesting that China adopts.
How many times do I need to tell you, I am not suggesting China to do one thing or another. Why is it so difficult to get that through your head? It's like talking to a wall
Fine. Doing nothing in this case is doing something (let those hostages die in vain) just in case you haven't figured it out yet.
OMG...

Did I say that China should do nothing? Like I said, I am not suggesting anything at all. In my very first post, I merely pointed out some issues. I then even agreed that the PRC government should send PLA special forces into Iraq to rescue these hostages. What is your problem?
What is yours?
Is this one of those heavy days?
Kulong
Apr 12 2004, 10:42 AM
Whatever -shurg I should've known better than to pay you any attention. You'd just manipulate my words and turn it into a pointless arguement as always
huaren
Apr 12 2004, 11:02 AM
I thought this was a Joking post? Why it end up in a way that doesn't look like a happy post?
Doan Du
Apr 12 2004, 11:03 AM
As always? Well, whatever, Kulong. If you don't want to debate with me, that's fine too. Not crying over it.
Kulong
Apr 12 2004, 11:07 AM
QUOTE (Doan Du @ Apr 12 2004, 11:03 AM)
As always? Well, whatever, Kulong. If you don't want to debate with me, that's fine too. Not crying over it.
I never did want to debate or argue with you. I pointed out what kind of possible problems and dilemmas China could face and even agreed that China should send special forces to rescue these hostages. It's you who manipulated my words. But anyway, you can think what you will. I am not going to waste any more public forum space to satisfy your urge to have petty fights with other members.
Doan Du
Apr 12 2004, 11:23 AM
QUOTE (Kulong @ Apr 12 2004, 12:07 PM)
QUOTE (Doan Du @ Apr 12 2004, 11:03 AM)
As always? Well, whatever, Kulong. If you don't want to debate with me, that's fine too. Not crying over it.
I never did want to debate or argue with you. I pointed out what kind of possible problems and dilemmas China could face and even agreed that China should send special forces to rescue these hostages. It's you who manipulated my words. But anyway, you can think what you will. I am not going to waste any more public forum space to satisfy your urge to have petty fights with other members.
Then why the hell did you quote my post and answer it? Thank you for letting me know that you have zero perspective as a Chinese regarding a Chinese matter.
You don't know why the Chinese nationals were there. You don't know why Iraqis are incapable of peace against just about anyone. Or is it that you have a principled perspective but can't say?
jenny2004
Apr 12 2004, 11:48 AM
sigh.
My cousin is flying a helicopter over Iraq...
YManchun
Apr 12 2004, 12:15 PM
QUOTE (Doan Du @ Apr 12 2004, 10:33 AM)
Sending in police rescue squads or Army special operation agents to rescue its own citizens does not equal to getting involved politically and militarily to Iraq. Nor does it contradict current or past Chinese policies and positions with regard to the Iraq invasion.
This would allow the world to see that China is truly a power and to let the people see how awsome the PLA capability is. Otherwise people would just say that the PLA special forces are only for photo opportunity or parade purpose.
Umm...chinese special forces won first place spots in some areas in the special forces competition of either 2002 or 2003? There were 13 countries that participated in the event.
Doan Du
Apr 12 2004, 01:19 PM
QUOTE (YManchun @ Apr 12 2004, 01:15 PM)
Umm...chinese special forces won first place spots in some areas in the special forces competition of either 2002 or 2003? There were 13 countries that participated in the event.
Oh yeah? In what areas?
I don't doubt that the Chinese special forces are very good but the proof is in the pudding. A succesful real life rescue mission would elevate their status at the forefront of credibility and respectability.
tongbao_vince
Apr 12 2004, 01:55 PM
Not sure about special forces competition... But in the world military games (olympics of the military world) China came 2nd overall. The top 5 were Russia, China, Italy, Ukraine, and North Korea. 86 nations participated but this is traditional sports competition and not a military competition using weapons or special operations.
Doan Du
Apr 12 2004, 02:03 PM
QUOTE (jenny2004 @ Apr 12 2004, 12:48 PM)
sigh.
My cousin is flying a helicopter over Iraq...
I have a friend who got there about 3 weeks ago. Eventhough his unit hasn't been attacked, I am very worried about him.
YManchun
Apr 12 2004, 02:43 PM
QUOTE (Doan Du @ Apr 12 2004, 02:19 PM)
QUOTE (YManchun @ Apr 12 2004, 01:15 PM)
Umm...chinese special forces won first place spots in some areas in the special forces competition of either 2002 or 2003? There were 13 countries that participated in the event.
Oh yeah? In what areas?
I don't doubt that the Chinese special forces are very good but the proof is in the pudding. A succesful real life rescue mission would elevate their status at the forefront of credibility and respectability.
I don't remember, they competed in genuine special operation scenarios. They earned much more respect from their foreign counter-parts.
Not on par with western special forces, but still quite good.
TDscorpion
Apr 12 2004, 05:12 PM
hmm, the root cause of these circumstances is resulting that the US has no post war plans. they Should have listened to former the army's chief of staff General Eric K Shinseki (he is asian, I think) because he believes that several of hundred thousand American troops could be required to provide security and public severvices after the war.
well,the Bush aministration would not take his view for it... so the lootings, hostages and so on... don't you agree?, by the way General Shinseki lost his job due to this disagreement
with his boss, Donald Rumsfeld
Kulong
Apr 12 2004, 05:16 PM
QUOTE (TDscorpion)
they Should have listened to former the army's chief of staff General Eric K Shinseki (he is asian, I think)
Shinseki is obviously Japanese.
QUOTE (TDscorpion)
by the way General Shinseki lost his job due to this disagreement
with his boss, Donald Rumsfeld
How ironic, he lost his job due to disagreement with his superiors in a country that values free speech.
Rad Raz
Apr 12 2004, 05:21 PM
QUOTE (Kulong @ Apr 12 2004, 06:16 PM)
How ironic, he lost his job due to disagreement with his superiors in a country that values free speech.
not in politic, obvously
Kulong
Apr 12 2004, 05:24 PM
QUOTE (Rad Raz @ Apr 12 2004, 05:21 PM)
QUOTE (Kulong @ Apr 12 2004, 06:16 PM)
How ironic, he lost his job due to disagreement with his superiors in a country that values free speech.
not in politic, obvously
The truly ironic part is, an important function of free speech is so that people can speak out against their leaders.
TDscorpion
Apr 12 2004, 05:27 PM
QUOTE
How ironic, he lost his job due to disagreement with his superiors in a country that values free speech.
Well, human nature plus politics
Ogumo
Apr 12 2004, 10:41 PM
QUOTE (Nam Quoc Son Ha @ Apr 11 2004, 09:13 PM)

LOL just joking.

When I read the title I thought "where the hell did they get these hostages!?" You really had me for the few seconds.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.