QUOTE
This time Chinese rule is shortlived. Rebel leader Le Loi builds a resistance force and defeats the Chinese in 1428. He takes the thrown and establishes a dynasty that will last until 1788, although once again internal dissent convulses the country, resulting in a partition in 1545. The southern 'Nguyen' continue their conquest of coastal territories and the Mekong Delta, encroaching into Kampuchea-Krom (today's southern Vietnam), which is inhabited by the culturally distinct Khmers (today's Cambodians). In the north the 'Trinh' consolidate their rule.
The country is reunited in 1786 during the 'Tay Son Rebellion', a period of war and instability that ends in 1802 with the enthronement of Gia Long, an emperor indebted to both the French and the Chinese for his rise. Gia Long changes the name of the country from Dai Viet to Nam Viet but is required by the Chinese to invert this to Viet Nam. French and European influence now becomes a growing factor in Vietnamese politics. By the middle of the 19th Century the French are planning for greater interference.
By 1862 the French have forcibly seized Kampuchea-Krom territory in the south and signed the 'Treaty of Saigon' granting them trade concessions and giving them control of three provinces. The entire country is made a French protectorate in 1883.
The country is reunited in 1786 during the 'Tay Son Rebellion', a period of war and instability that ends in 1802 with the enthronement of Gia Long, an emperor indebted to both the French and the Chinese for his rise. Gia Long changes the name of the country from Dai Viet to Nam Viet but is required by the Chinese to invert this to Viet Nam. French and European influence now becomes a growing factor in Vietnamese politics. By the middle of the 19th Century the French are planning for greater interference.
By 1862 the French have forcibly seized Kampuchea-Krom territory in the south and signed the 'Treaty of Saigon' granting them trade concessions and giving them control of three provinces. The entire country is made a French protectorate in 1883.
source: http://www.moreorless.au.com/background/vietnam.htm
QUOTE
1949 - On 1 July a French-sponsored Vietnamese Government is established in Saigon. The territory administered by the new government incorporates Kampuchea-Krom (Cochin-China), which is largely inhabited by culturally distinct Khmers (Cambodians). The Khmer-Krom had been hoping for independence, and the inclusion of their ancestral lands into Vietnam will create ongoing tensions that to this day remain unresolved
source: http://www.moreorless.au.com/heroes/ho.htm
QUOTE
‘Centre and Periphery’: The Ambiguous Life of the Khmer Kampuchea Krom in Postcolonial Southeast Asia
Marc Askew, Victoria University of Technology, Melbourne
This paper investigates the construction and representation of ethnicity and place among the Khmer Krom minority of Southern Vietnam and its diaspora. The "Kampuchea Krom" as a territory, has played a crucial symbolic role in Khmer nationalist (fundamentally anti-Vietnamese) narratives (from the Sihanouk period through to the Pol Pot regime). But the people of this territory have occupied an ambiguous place in the postcolonial histories of Cambodia and Vietnam. The Khmer Krom, who occupy the Mekong Delta region, are a particular socio-cultural fragment of a larger cultural-territorial formation which was progressively appropriated into the neighboring states of Vietnam and Siam (17th–19th centuries), taken over by a European colonial power (France 19th century–1954), a post-colonial Vietnamese republic (1954–1975) and then a socialist state (1975 to present). Khmer Krom political and cultural mobilizations in the twentieth century (from covert everyday resistance to overt politico-ethnic opposition) were cumulatively shaped both by the pre-colonial past and developments during the period of French administration and then a combination of mounting local and external changes and pressures generated by the post WWII politico-ideological environment. French decolonization, the various nationalist independence movements, the establishment of the states of Cochinchina (1949) then South Vietnam (1954) and the escalating U.S. involvement in Vietnam and Cambodia from the late 1960s, have all resonated through the communities of the Kampuchea Krom and, its growing diaspora. This paper focuses on the critical period spanning 1945–1975, when Khmer Krom ethnonationalism was militarized and fictionalized in the context of South Vietnamese and Cambodian politics and U.S. intervention.
Marc Askew, Victoria University of Technology, Melbourne
This paper investigates the construction and representation of ethnicity and place among the Khmer Krom minority of Southern Vietnam and its diaspora. The "Kampuchea Krom" as a territory, has played a crucial symbolic role in Khmer nationalist (fundamentally anti-Vietnamese) narratives (from the Sihanouk period through to the Pol Pot regime). But the people of this territory have occupied an ambiguous place in the postcolonial histories of Cambodia and Vietnam. The Khmer Krom, who occupy the Mekong Delta region, are a particular socio-cultural fragment of a larger cultural-territorial formation which was progressively appropriated into the neighboring states of Vietnam and Siam (17th–19th centuries), taken over by a European colonial power (France 19th century–1954), a post-colonial Vietnamese republic (1954–1975) and then a socialist state (1975 to present). Khmer Krom political and cultural mobilizations in the twentieth century (from covert everyday resistance to overt politico-ethnic opposition) were cumulatively shaped both by the pre-colonial past and developments during the period of French administration and then a combination of mounting local and external changes and pressures generated by the post WWII politico-ideological environment. French decolonization, the various nationalist independence movements, the establishment of the states of Cochinchina (1949) then South Vietnam (1954) and the escalating U.S. involvement in Vietnam and Cambodia from the late 1960s, have all resonated through the communities of the Kampuchea Krom and, its growing diaspora. This paper focuses on the critical period spanning 1945–1975, when Khmer Krom ethnonationalism was militarized and fictionalized in the context of South Vietnamese and Cambodian politics and U.S. intervention.
source: http://www.aasianst.org/absts/2002abst/Sou...st/sessions.htm
Enjoy,
Thay_____________