DAI_VIET
Feb 24 2004, 09:42 PM
I've always wanted to know what the Japanese think of Pearl Harbor. Was it a mistake that the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor? I think they certaintly did, but that's just my opinion.
Ogumo
Feb 24 2004, 10:14 PM
The biggest mistake in japanese history. Yamamoto knew from the very begining what would happen. He understood americans he dealt with them for years at harvard university. He understood the superior industrial capabilities of america. The military asked his opinion about it and he told them japan would not survive if they brought america into the war. Of course when the americans ended the raw supplies like rubber for example this affected the planes and various other weapons that were required to fight. He was ordered to retaliate against the americans. Even in the higher positions of the government they knew they could not defeat america. The plan was to make to where the americans would not want to aggitate japan. So they would not think that it was "worth the costs". This is why the army did not invade. Simply destroyed what was in their sight and left. Yamamoto knew what his actions would mean if he attacked america. Defeat. If disobey he would have been executed. War thirsty japan could have robbed china of all the resources it required but they were not willing to wait. That completely could have been avoided.
Keymaker
Feb 24 2004, 10:47 PM
If it weren't for the Pearl Harbor event, the crappy movie of the same name would have never came out.
Ogumo
Feb 24 2004, 10:52 PM
QUOTE (Keymaker @ Feb 24 2004, 11:47 PM)
If it weren't for the Pearl Harbor event, the crappy movie of the same name would have never came out.
Tell me you are joking with that statement? Do not be offended. If this was any other forum besides asiafinest I would have asked.
DAI_VIET
Feb 24 2004, 10:54 PM
Interesting... I guess Yamamoto is considered a Japanese hero then heh?
Ogumo
Feb 24 2004, 11:03 PM
QUOTE (DAI_VIET @ Feb 24 2004, 11:54 PM)
Interesting... I guess Yamamoto is considered a Japanese hero then heh?
You could say that.
Keymaker
Feb 24 2004, 11:05 PM
QUOTE (Ogumo @ Feb 24 2004, 11:52 PM)
QUOTE (Keymaker @ Feb 24 2004, 11:47 PM)
If it weren't for the Pearl Harbor event, the crappy movie of the same name would have never came out.
Tell me you are joking with that statement? Do not be offended. If this was any other forum besides asiafinest I would have asked.
I was joking.
Akata
Feb 25 2004, 07:23 PM
i think the mistake is wrong calculation on time .because if japanese army bombed pearl harbour a little bit late when the atlantic ship(i think) and the another ship came back from patrol , i am sure america will not have any big ship left and america could not nuke hiroshima and nagasaki. i don't know is that right or not but i ever hear that.
Rad Raz
Feb 25 2004, 09:45 PM
the giantic U.S. carrier which the japanese tried to bomb had to sent back to the harbor factory to repair/upgrade it. The carrier's name was Enterprise and it is a twice the size of Arizona battleship.
There was no such a ship call Atlantic battleship in US
Ogumo
Feb 25 2004, 09:54 PM
QUOTE (Akata @ Feb 25 2004, 08:23 PM)
i think the mistake is wrong calculation on time .because if japanese army bombed pearl harbour a little bit late when the atlantic ship(i think) and the another ship came back from patrol , i am sure america will not have any big ship left and america could not nuke hiroshima and nagasaki. i don't know is that right or not but i ever hear that.
That is incorrect. If japan had waited until 1945 to attack america. Imperial japan may still exist today.
直隸總督
Feb 25 2004, 10:13 PM
Strategically, Japan made a mistake. but tactically, it was a great success.
Doan Du
Feb 25 2004, 10:31 PM
That wasn't a strategic mistake at all. The US Navy just got lucky because all the aircraft carriers had gone out to sea many days earlier and thus escaped the whole mayhem.
Had they been caught at Pearl Harbor, there would not be anything floating between the Japanese Navy and the lightly defended West Coast of the United States.
The only mistake that Japan made was Admiral Nagumo's decision not to go for broke (i.e. launch the 4th wave and finish off the US fleet). That proves to be costly later for Japan.
直隸總督
Feb 25 2004, 10:40 PM
strategic mistake = a mistake which affects the entire war. Japan accidently brought USA into the war, and eventually lost
tactical = speaking of the specific battle. Japan did a great job at Pearl Harbor
Keymaker
Feb 25 2004, 10:43 PM
And to this day, historians still wonder why the Japanese never used machine guns in WWII.
Doan Du
Feb 25 2004, 10:54 PM
QUOTE (Keymaker @ Feb 25 2004, 11:43 PM)
And to this day, historians still wonder why the Japanese never used machine guns in WWII.
They did.
Most of the Japanese machine guns were various copies of French and English models such as Hotchkiss and Bren.
Keymaker
Feb 25 2004, 10:59 PM
Well, yeah. Eventually, they did. But it took them so long before they adopted them. I wonder this myself.
Doan Du
Feb 25 2004, 11:00 PM
QUOTE (直隸總督 @ Feb 25 2004, 11:40 PM)
strategic mistake = a mistake which affects the entire war. Japan accidently brought USA into the war, and eventually lost
tactical = speaking of the specific battle. Japan did a great job at Pearl Harbor
Huh?
Japan did not "accidentally" bring the US into the war. Japan deliberately brought the war to the US by attacking the US Pacific Fleet without declaring war.
Rad Raz
Feb 25 2004, 11:01 PM
well because japanese weapons weren't that advanced as european WW2 weapons in beggining of WW2.
Keymaker
Feb 25 2004, 11:04 PM
Not quite. The Japanese had the technology available to them in the beginning of WWII. Historians have debated about this for quite some time. The popular idea in existence now is that the Japanese military felt that they didn't need machine guns to win the war. Some other theories are there, but it's...interesting. I too wonder about this.
Rad Raz
Feb 25 2004, 11:08 PM
i never said the japanese didn't have the technology from beginning of WW2, I sad their weapon technology weren't advanced or surpassed to German weapon, or the British, Americans, Soviets
Ogumo
Feb 25 2004, 11:23 PM
QUOTE (Rad Raz @ Feb 26 2004, 12:08 AM)
i never said the japanese didn't have the technology from beginning of WW2, I sad their weapon technology weren't advanced or surpassed to German weapon, or the British, Americans, Soviets
If you speak of ground weapons yes. But air and navy were right on target with american and german.
As for the machine guns. They were used. Infact korean slaves were usually using them in most cases. They were effective but there were things that were not neccisary. I have seen one that had bayonette attached. There was also one that tunnel was removeable so it could be replaced and allowed to cool. German machine guns were far superior.
toonluv
Feb 26 2004, 12:57 AM
korean slaves? what? Don't ever call us slaves, I don't care if its even referring to the past and i will tell you why. First of all, we were not an inferior culture, we were 'enslaved' because of our close proximity and the contribution of value which was literally the disemmination of OUR culture and our hard-earned achievements, mind you! because evidently you couldn't or lacked the imagination to start from scratch. This is a totally different situation than the classic scenario of slaves where they have no inherent or bring no inherent value besides their physical self and are used to proliferate another's sole ideas. The relation of koreans being 'slaves' of japan is a complex one and is a bit embarassing for japan as well if we look deeply into the what's and not's.
Ogumo
Feb 26 2004, 01:02 AM
I never said the koreans are inferior. But it does seem that you personally have a inferiority complex perhaps? The koreans back then WERE slaves of japan. That was a fact. You cannot let everything offend you. Would you have wanted me to lie and call them korean "helpers" or something ridiculous like that? I only stated a fact. How was that offensive? You came at me like I said modern koreans are slaves for japan. And we are not the same people. Perhaps the same race but that is all. I do not know where you saw me type the koreans are inferior. Now I have defended myself from your ridiculous comments twice before. The next time I will not be nice about it.
直隸總督
Feb 26 2004, 01:19 AM
QUOTE (toonluv @ Feb 26 2004, 01:57 AM)
korean slaves? what? Don't ever call us slaves, I don't care if its even referring to the past and i will tell you why. First of all, we were not an inferior culture, we were 'enslaved' because of our close proximity and the contribution of value which was literally the disemmination of OUR culture and our hard-earned achievements, mind you! because evidently you couldn't or lacked the imagination to start from scratch. This is a totally different situation than the classic scenario of slaves where they have no inherent or bring no inherent value besides their physical self and are used to proliferate another's sole ideas. The relation of koreans being 'slaves' of japan is a complex one and is a bit embarassing for japan as well if we look deeply into the what's and not's.
This is like American Negroids who sue history textbooks for calling them slaves.
SakuraSkater
Feb 26 2004, 01:54 AM
-shakes head- ...lol.. japanese navy had elite weapons until 1942.. battle of midway was when the japanese started to lose control of the pacific. their best naval plane was the a6m zeke aka reisen or zero fighter. however, it had several flaws that the imperial navy would soon regret. the zeke could out climb and out fly pretty much any fighter in the pacific, but it had weak armor and since it was so light it couldn't dive worth rice. when a zeke was launched to scout the islands of alaska, something happened and the pilot did a crash landing. the plane rolled when he landed and the pilot was killed instantly from a broken neck. later on a US patrol found the fighter and amazingly enough it was still in flying condition. they took it back and studied it. after studying the aircraft we decided to make a fighter that would dominate the zeke, the grumman f6 hellcat was born. the hellcat brought the pain to the zekes... it could out range it, carry more weapons and had way more armor. the hellcat was so successful that it earned the name " ace maker" and had the most kills out of any other plane in ww2. the f4 corsair came out around the same time as the hellcat i believe. the imperial navy gave it the nick name of whistling death. let's not forget about the very unforgiving p-38 lightning which decimated fighters and bomber groups. hmm.. pearl harbor was really just a waste of time for japan. attacking the US is sort of like smacking a hornets' nest. in the first initial strike.. some hornets will die or get wounded.. but then the rest of them just swarm you... hmm -thinks if someone is too cowardly to declare war then they shouldn't be fighting in the first place-

oh well... haha what can i say..governments suck
besides.. war is stupid and nothing great comes from it.
Keymaker
Feb 26 2004, 02:00 AM
QUOTE (直隸總督 @ Feb 26 2004, 02:19 AM)
This is like American Negroids who sue history textbooks for calling them slaves.
But what do we know, right? We're just Mongoloids.
toonluv
Feb 26 2004, 03:58 AM
QUOTE
Originally brought to the United States as a form of cheap labor during the Civil War, Chinese men entered at the bottom rung of the social and economic ladder. Chinese laborers were viewed as cheap, expendable, slave labor - intended to serve as an alternative to African American slaves, which Maxine Hong Kingston addresses in her novel, Chinamen. The images of lowly Chinese that prevailed during the mid- 1850s were used as justification for the low status Chinese in the American racial hierarchy. As different Asian groups immigrated into the United States, this subordination was extended to include all Asians.
QUOTE
As Chinese scholars disclosed, during Japan's invasion of China, countless Chinese people were forced to become laborers. They were subjected to Japan's inhuman enslavement, innumerable workers were tortured to death. The survivors were also covered with scars. Reference materials discovered last year in Qingdao Archive office concerning Japanese troops' transport of laborers from Qingdao to northeast China and Japan during of the war of resistance show that from 1939 to the first half of 1944, Japanese troops transferred 740,000 laborers from Qingdao.
QUOTE
Japanese emigrating to the US have traditionally encountered discrimination. As the Congressional act of 1790 demonstrates, immigrants of Asian heritage were not even allowed American citizenship. Some of the first Japanese immigrants to the US faced tremendous economic hardships. In the early 1850s, Japan was experiencing a depression, forcing many Japanese to emigrate to the United States. Most arrived with little financial support, and often had to settle for grueling, backbreaking work in farming, building railways, factories, canneries, or nurseries.
Being new to the US and speaking little or no English, these workers were often exploited, made to work for less money, and in conditions unacceptable to most Americans.
QUOTE
Civil War in the United States begins, eventually ending the institution of slave labor. Americans search for new sources of cheap labor. Japanese laborers are illegally shipped to Hawaii.
QUOTE
This is like American Negroids who sue history textbooks for calling them slaves.
How petty of me. I mean i see that chinese and japanese were 'enslaved' as well. I stand soberly and quite corrected.
toonluv
Feb 26 2004, 05:13 AM
QUOTE
African-Americans, the most familiar friend Japan had
We African-Americans, pay our greatest respect to the Japanese.
"Twelve million African-Americans in the States are watching the course of the meeting."
During the Paris Peace Conference of 1919, African-Americans kept their eyes on the Japanese who participated and who suggested the idea of the "racial equality" at the meeting. When the Japanese Mission Plenipotentiary stopped in New York on their way to Paris, four African-American leaders bypassed President Wilson and directly told the Mission to try hard to abolish racial discrimination all over the world. African-Americans who suffered from racial discrimination saw the Japanese as leading bearers because they were admitted into the World Power in spite of their color. At the meeting, the Japanese suggestion won the approval of 11 out of 16 countries. However, President Wilson, the chairperson, rejected this result saying, "This is not unanimous." This statement led to riots throughout the country where more than a hundred people were killed and several thousands injured.
Brown men continue beating Caucasians.
It was during the Russo-Japanese War that African-Americans put their hope in the Japanese. They thought that a small colored country was challenging a bold fight against a big Caucasian country. If Japan won, the day would come when they would cry, "Asia only for Asian people." African-American leaders thought that this foresees well for the future of Africa, their Mother Country. The Russo-Japanese War challenged a myth made by Europeans saying, "Colored people will never win over the Caucasians."
A sense of solidarity and understanding of sympathy between African-Americans and Japanese immigrants.
African-Americans warmly accepted Japanese immigrants who came to the U.S. in the 1920's. The Philadelphia Tribune expressed the following: African-Americans respect Japanese people from the bottom of our hearts. Although they are an oppressed race like us, we should follow their behavior to make great efforts to achieve the goals. In Oakland, California, Japanese often put advertisement in newspapers published by African-Americans. Likewise, Japanese newspapers ran articles that criticized racial discrimination targeted against African-Americans. Also, a Japanese hospital hired two African-American doctors, so the California Eagle expressed, "It is a great thing that a Japanese hospital opened the door to other races. "The image of Japanese as equal to African-American spread rapidly in the West Coast through the media." The words, "a sense of solidarity and understanding of sympathy" were often used to describe the relationship between the two.
Save Japanese
One African-American who heard about the news of the Great Kanto Earthquake in 1923 wrote to the Chicago Defender, "Colored people in America, that is to say we, African-Americans, indeed can save the Japanese, the same colored people as us. "Soon the paper began a campaign to save the Japanese. "Surely we are poor. However, if we do not donate now, when on the earth will we donate." The eager message in the paper penetrated into the African-American community and they donated a large amount of money to Japan.
Japanese countenance to Ethiopia
Against the aggression to Ethiopia by Italy, African-Americans tried to help this one and only independent country in Africa as a fortress. Compare with the negative attitude of the United States, Japanese appeals for Ethiopian support, which had more appeals than the United Nations, moved African-Americans. And above of all, what moved African-Americans was a plan for the marriage between the Ethiopian crown prince and a lady of the Japanese imperial family. Although this could not be brought into fruition, this is an evidence that Japan was interested in making an alliance with Ethiopia.
Unforgettable experience in Japan
In 1936, W. E. B. Du Bois, a leader in the African-American community, wrote a column about his two weeks stay in Japan to the Pittsburgh Clear entitled, "Unforgettable Experience." When he was checking out one of the hotels in Tokyo, a typical American white lady wedged in front of him. A receptionist lady ignored the American lady and kept attending to him. After he finished his check, the receptionist made a deep bow to Du Bois, then she began to attend to the American lady. Her resolute attitude foresaw the opening of a New World.
There is no reason to fight with the Japanese.
About the Japan-US War, Du Bois said, "If America admitted Japanese rights, the war would not have broken out." African-American soldiers who experienced racial discrimination in the military could not find a reason why they should fight against the Japanese, the same colored people as them, for Caucasians.
Do we pass off the Japanese camps?
During the war, Japanese immigrants who had American civil rights were interned in camps. African-Americans were shocked deeply. First, the fact that only Japanese Americans were interned in camps, not German Americans or Italian Americans, was clearly an example of racial prejudice. Second, African-Americans could have been interned in camps because it happened to the Japanese Americans who also had the same American civil rights as them.
Do we, African-Americans, pass off that a hundred fifteen thousand Japanese Americans were deprived of their freedom as Americans at one time?
One columnist of the Los Angeles Tribune called the All African-American Improvement Committee, so the chairperson of the committee submitted the following, "We must stand against having our rights as Americans because of our races and colors of skin being invaded." After the war, African-American society warmly welcomed the Japanese who came back from the camps. They helped their fellow Americans look for jobs and invited Japanese Americans to their churches.
The most familiar friend whom Japan had in history
Dr. Reginald Carney, a scholar of African-American studies, wrote: "The most familiar friend whom Japan had in history was the African-American. At one time, the Japanese were respected by African-Americans and considered as the same colored people. I am eager for the Japanese to take back such thoughts of reverence and endearment once more."
Wow, It seems throughout american history african-americans have identified with the japanese due to the discrimination, inferior slave-like status and internment camps in the dark of american history to the point of 'adopting' japanese as a kindred people.
Rad Raz
Feb 26 2004, 01:07 PM
well, japan was once korea's slave state during sila period.
Anyway, does japananese kids in these days learning that koreans were forced to work for japan, or they volunteered to help japan during WW2? For simple, does japanese history text book says the koreans were japan's slaves or helpers?
Ogumo
Feb 26 2004, 03:12 PM
Slaves... and no they do not give much more information than that.
toonluv
Feb 26 2004, 03:25 PM
Are japanese taught that japan was once korea's slave state? Of course not! very telling perspective.
Ogumo
Feb 26 2004, 03:27 PM
QUOTE (toonluv @ Feb 26 2004, 04:25 PM)
Are japanese taught that japan was once korea's slave state? Of course not! very telling perspective.
You know something toonluv. I asked you to prove several of your ridiculous comments in the past. You never did so. Why is that? Perhaps because you talk before you think?
toonluv
Feb 26 2004, 03:41 PM
Truly and honestly tell me, japanese children are taught that japanese were once slaves? I find that hard to believe considering the government is so keen on whitewashing it's historybooks.
Ogumo
Feb 26 2004, 03:47 PM
QUOTE (toonluv @ Feb 26 2004, 04:41 PM)
Truly and honestly tell me, japanese children are taught that japanese were once slaves? I find that hard to believe considering the government is so keen on whitewashing it's historybooks.
No and infact I would like to see proof from you that this was true. Because I trust nothing that comes from your mouth. I typed into google a request. The only thing that came up were things from the early 1900s when japan had enslaved korea. Infact
kulong if you see this perhaps you would like to explaine if there is truth to this? Now I am interested in this. For the moment toonluv tell me about this alleged enslavement of japan by korea. If kulong sees this I am sure he will verify it. Because I will not search for information that I do not believe exists.
AtlantisStar
Feb 26 2004, 04:04 PM
IN A FORMAL PERSUASION, MAKE A POINT THEN PROVE IT WITH AT LEAST 3 SOLID FACTUAL EVIDENCES. THIS IS GETTING REALLY DUMB, I KNOW PLENTY OF JAPANESE PEOPLE, INCLUDING ME, WHO WOULD NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT THE HELL YOUR COMING FROM.
Ogumo
Feb 26 2004, 04:12 PM
QUOTE (AtlantisStar @ Feb 26 2004, 05:04 PM)
IN A FORMAL PERSUASION, MAKE A POINT THEN PROVE IT WITH AT LEAST 3 SOLID FACTUAL EVIDENCES. THIS IS GETTING REALLY DUMB, I KNOW PLENTY OF JAPANESE PEOPLE, INCLUDING ME, WHO WOULD NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT THE HELL YOUR COMING FROM.
Who are you talking to me or toonluv? Also from what I understand you are only half japanese.
toonluv
Feb 26 2004, 04:31 PM
QUOTE
Because I will not search for information that I do not believe exists.
Exactly
QUOTE
IN A FORMAL PERSUASION, MAKE A POINT THEN PROVE IT WITH AT LEAST 3 SOLID FACTUAL EVIDENCES. THIS IS GETTING REALLY DUMB, I KNOW PLENTY OF JAPANESE PEOPLE, INCLUDING ME, WHO WOULD NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT THE HELL YOUR COMING FROM.
You know, I'm really fed up with japanese imperialistic attitudes. Translation= How dare you even imply we were slaves, that is beneath us not like others. Taken from a different perspective your history is quite pathetic actually. Your hyped up dreams of origin for starters amounts to a roadside attraction and your unwillingness to even acknowledge your connection to the mainland is only on a superficial level, demeaning, or dishonest. Your ego is so fragile and so western influenced you do everything to overshadow your neighbors while placating western adoration. How you politically identify yourself is through western perspective and thats an advantage japan has used shamelessly.
Ogumo
Feb 26 2004, 04:37 PM
Toonluv the only reason I believe this information does not exist is because you claim it does. I question your motives. You are clearly a very biased anti japanese korean. Why did you not post any links? You read my post clearly. That is not such a hard task. If it was varified by kulong or any of the other CHINESE nationalists I would look further into it. Until then I do not believe your claim. When I am proven wrong I will gladly appologize to you.
On a side note. It does not matter to me if japan was enslaved by korea years ago....IF it really happened. You make it seem like it is impossible to accept....perhaps this is your imperialist korean attitude greeting us this day? I really do grow tired of the korean supremicist and imperialists attitudes. Possibly in a similar way that you do...
Rad Raz
Feb 26 2004, 04:41 PM
korean imperialists? lol
Ogumo
Feb 26 2004, 04:44 PM
QUOTE (Rad Raz @ Feb 26 2004, 05:41 PM)
korean imperialists? lol
Well if they enslaved japanese people. Like toonluv claims. What the hell would you call that? imperialism. Nothing short of it.
Rad Raz
Feb 26 2004, 04:48 PM
you got a point there, but that was about 800 years ago.
AtlantisStar
Feb 26 2004, 05:46 PM
QUOTE (toonluv @ Feb 26 2004, 05:31 PM)
QUOTE
Because I will not search for information that I do not believe exists.
Exactly
QUOTE
IN A FORMAL PERSUASION, MAKE A POINT THEN PROVE IT WITH AT LEAST 3 SOLID FACTUAL EVIDENCES. THIS IS GETTING REALLY DUMB, I KNOW PLENTY OF JAPANESE PEOPLE, INCLUDING ME, WHO WOULD NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT THE HELL YOUR COMING FROM.
You know, I'm really fed up with japanese imperialistic attitudes. Translation= How dare you even imply we were slaves, that is beneath us not like others. Taken from a different perspective your history is quite pathetic actually. Your hyped up dreams of origin for starters amounts to a roadside attraction and your unwillingness to even acknowledge your connection to the mainland is only on a superficial level, demeaning, or dishonest. Your ego is so fragile and so western influenced you do everything to overshadow your neighbors while placating western adoration. How you politically identify yourself is through western perspective and thats an advantage japan has used shamelessly.
Are you slow?
An Empire defines one nation with conquered territory. Japan therefore is not an empire, and by the transitive property Japan does not have Imperialism.
Plus I was only stating, give
FACTUAL evidence.
DO NOT PROVE AN OPINION WITH AND OPINIONS
toonluv
Feb 26 2004, 05:53 PM
No, i am far from being slow. Perhaps you are because titles are just, which does not prevent anyone from an imperialistic attitude or belief system. America is supposed to be about equality where all men are created equal, does everyone live and operate by that creed? Give me a break, the point is moot.
AtlantisStar
Feb 26 2004, 05:59 PM
QUOTE (toonluv @ Feb 26 2004, 06:53 PM)
No, i am far from being slow. Perhaps you are because titles are just, which does not prevent anyone from an imperialistic attitude. America is supposed to be about equality where all men are created equal, does everyone live and operate by that creed. Give me a break, the point is moot.
YOU ARE SLOW! YOUR LAST POST JUST PROVED IT.
Look peeps want you to give evidence, not a opinion to prove an opinion.
Imperialism specific defines for a EMPIRE. Japan has no imperial possession. Therefore it is imperialism.
You mean nationalism, the pride for ones country (and a more complicated definition after)
I'm not giving titles.
Mind you, your posts are structured..
Why are you avoiding giving proof of your opinion?A document with a bibliography would be nice. I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't grasp anything you say because you just avoid showing me anything.
toonluv
Feb 26 2004, 06:17 PM
you don't understand my simple point. seeing the once conquered still as so even though there is no actual possession is more reminescent of an imperialistic attitude than just a nationalistic one.
AtlantisStar
Feb 26 2004, 06:31 PM
QUOTE (toonluv @ Feb 26 2004, 07:17 PM)
you don't understand my simple point. seeing the once conquered still as so even though there is no actual possession is more reminescent of an imperialistic attitude than just a nationalistic one.
NO NO NOThere is a precise definition for Imperialism. It implies to an Empire. There is no other definition.
IMPERIALISM DEFINES: The policy of extending a nation's authority by territorial acquisition or by the establishment of economic and political hegemony over other nations. Do you see that in Japan? No because Japan is not an Empire (meaning to own other territories) nor is it giving policies.
There is no Imperialism. It just can't happen. It's like calling switzerland is containing imperialism concepts.
You are wrong. There can be no reminisence of Imperialism, because Japan is by itself in its original territory.
Rad Raz
Feb 26 2004, 06:56 PM
shut up.
Japan was once an empire. And they were imperial, you can't just say japan wasn't imperialistic, and if they weren't why in the hell history text book says "japanese imperial army invaded manchuria, shanghai"?
You are just in denial, and you also haven't proven any of your so call facts
AtlantisStar
Feb 26 2004, 06:58 PM
QUOTE (Rad Raz @ Feb 26 2004, 07:56 PM)
shut up.
This topic is way over. Most of you here make a blind opinion and have no evidence to back it up
Rad Raz
Feb 26 2004, 07:12 PM
you are slow also, aren't you? you still haven't proven your arguements, and all you do is flaming other guy. This thread was way over, when toonluv and you started argueing.
AtlantisStar
Feb 26 2004, 07:18 PM
QUOTE (Rad Raz @ Feb 26 2004, 08:12 PM)
you are slow also, aren't you? you still haven't proven your arguements, and all you do is flaming other guy. This thread was way over, when toonluv and you started argueing.
No I'm arguing the recent one that states today.
But nonetheless it's wrong, and I had to get it out of my system.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.