Did Vietnam invade or liberate Cambodia?
Greeting All,
I browse through different Asian Culture Forums on this discussion board and learn that some of the forums such as those of the Chinese and the Vietnamese ones are full of posters. Overall, most of those posters in those forums are using a debating technique called “You say, I say” where they try to disprove each other’s contention by bringing in the so-called pieces of evidence. It is quite entertaining to follow the drama if you have time to waste.
Anyway, today I’d like to present the topic “Did Vietnam invade or liberate Cambodia?” to the general readers. I will present my side of the coin, and with your willingness, you must also speak your side of the coin. I predict that it will be quite entertaining to debate on the different contentions.
January 7th, 2004 marked the 25th commemoration of the Vietnamese victory in Cambodia. On the occasion, the head of the ruling Cambodian People’s Party (CPP) thanked the Vietnamese government for ending the ultra-Maoist Khmer Rouge regime in Cambodia.
However, while the ruling Cambodian People’s Party went on with its Vietnamese-thanking ceremony, dozens of democratic Cambodian activists disputed that January 7 was a day of shame as it marked the beginning of Vietnamese takeover and the loss of Cambodia’s independence and large parts of land.
Yimsut (2003) wrote that some Khmer view the Vietnamese as “invaders” based on two realities: Vietnam’s occupation policy and historical perceptions.
After successfully ousting the Khmer Rouge government in Cambodia, Vietnam controlled Cambodia for 10 years. Under its control, Vietnam set up and subjugated a puppet regime to run Cambodia. In addition, Vietnam appropriated large portions of Cambodia’s land and caused destruction of the Khmer people. This action of Vietnam clearly showed its true purpose and guiding principle. Only after the Soviet Unions collapsed that Vietnam ended its game and withdrew its forces from Cambodia in 1989.
According to the Khmer historical perceptions of Vietnam, that country has always been identified as the culprit that took over Khmer land and practiced “genocidal policy against the Khmer people”. The valid evidence to support this Vietnamese annexation and expansionism includes Kampuchea Krom and former Kingdom of Champa. Furthermore, as a unified country, Vietnam’s plan for the countries of Laos and Cambodia is still one of territorial spreading out or takeover. Proof of this policy is better seen through Vietnam’s actions in stationing its troop in Laos and occupying the Cambodian islands and land near the Vietnam-Cambodia border.
Some authors supported the Khmer view that the Vietnamese should be considered the invaders of Cambodia. For example, Grandolini, Cooper, & Troung (2004) wrote, “The Vietnamese regime were actually not concerned by the genocidal policy of the Khmer Rouge, but rather with fulfilling their historical ambition of regional domination, as well as stopping the spread of the Chinese influence in Cambodia. Nguyen Co Thach, the then Vietnamese Foreign Minister, later said that, “Human rights were not a question; That was THEIR problem – we were concerned only with security.”
Also it seems that the general Vietnamese view on this discussion board supports the Khmer view that the Vietnamese were the invaders of Cambodia. For example, in the Vietnamese Forum, a poster by the nick of Dai Viet arrogantly wrote that, “…We (Vietnam) [can] invade Cambodia in less than 1 week and capture their capital. We will turn Cambodia into our provinces and impose our culture upon you and you will learn to speak our language, dress our clothes, and obey our laws. Do it, and the Cambodian culture will survive; do it not, and you will see yourself like the Chams, you do remember the lessons of the Chams right? We erased their entire history, and you don't want to be like the Chams, right? If you do not obey the laws from your superior Vietnamese, we will have to destroy your entire civilization and the world will not even recognize your stones at all. Understand this, and you shall live. Understand this not, you shall suffer. WHEN COME TO VIETNAM, DO LIKE THE VIETNAMESE DO."
Another Vietnamese poster named Byron wrote, “The Khmer empire was very huge in land. Until the Vietnamese waged war on it and took lands from the Khmer Empire. Basically the only land left for the Cambodians is Cambodia. And even that land is controlled by the Vietnamese based government.” Byron continued his understanding of Vietnam’s ability to expand as follows, “… After Vietnam took over Cambodia, the Khmer Rouge ran into Thailand, and Vietnamese troops decided to chase them and started shooting artillery over the Cambodian border into Thailand. Thailand was scared and the U.N pressured Vietnam not to attack Thailand because Thailand would probably be defeated since they have never had a lot of combat experience since they've never been in any real wars. If it wasn't for the U.N I think Thailand would be occupied by Vietnam as well.”
So what do you readers think? Were the Vietnamese the “invaders” who capitalized on the Cambodian disability?
Until Next Time,
FKR
Reference:
“Cambodia commemorates end of Pol Pot” retrieved February 21, 2004 from http://www.khaleejtimes.co.ae/ktarchive/070103/theworld.htm
Yimsut, R. (2003) Vietnam: Was It Liberation or Invasion?
Grandolini, A., Cooper, T, & Troung. (2004) Indochina Database: Cambodia, 1954-1999; Part 3 from ACIG.org.