My specialty is to reveal to and educate the younger generation of ethnic vietnamese on the love/hate relationship between chinese/vietnamese.
It never ceases to amuse/bug me to observe that viet pride that displays in oh so many different ways.
One nationalistic teaching of vietnamese is to emphasize and exaggerate its distinction from the chinese neighbors/invaders/conquerors/(ancient enemies)/(wealthy business class people).
Ask your parents about their sentiment towards chinese.
We can commonly agree that viets are a part of Yuehs, and the fact that Viets can maintain a sense of separate identity from the Han chinese even after 1000 yrs of colonial rule is a testament to the resolution that the viet tribe has to maintain a sense of self, I fully acknowledge that.
But as I had said elsewhere in this forum, common sense understanding of history and human movement shows the viets cannot be as "unique" as whatever nationalistic education attempts to convey.
People move around, Han chinese moved south, mixed with Yuehs and Viets, integrated, and then developed a new identity.
Also the viets expanded and conquered/absorbed other tribes in its nation building process, so any emphasis on tribal uniqueness is to me pure exaggeration.
Attached below is a book review on "The birth of Vietnam" in amazon.com
The reviewer displays what I would call a typical nationalistic viet attitude towards chinese.
Read it for background understanding of the antagonism between viets and chinese.
If you're too young or too westernized to know much about this, ask your parents.
Viet/chinese antagonism is no simple laughing matter, it's at the core of viet identity.
Mind you though I fully aware that most chinese don't know or care too much of viet culture/history/identity/nationalism.
In fact many chinese do have a superiority complex when viewing vietnamese, and that attitude does bring out the worst of viet nationalism.
My apology on behalf of those arrogant chinese.
Amazon.com:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detai...=glance&s=books
Begin quote:
1 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
To "Not really..." who's blinded by sheer ignorance, October 1, 2003
Reviewer: Less Ignorant than a fool (Vietnam) - See all my reviews
Your ignorance surprises me. You lack knowledge in almost all fields of Vietnamese history! People in VIETNAM resent Communist rule, Vietnam was at a much better economic (some might say at a boom) before the war started. China only supplied the knife which rammed into the hearts of the Vietnamese people. There's a reason why Vietnam today is moving farther and farther away from Communism and more and more towards Capitalism.
The native language of the Yueh tribe was not Cantonese. Your conclusion is once again a product of ingnorance. You are probably Chinese, and Cantonese. The Cantonese langauge can be translated to Yue, and the Cantonese can be identified as a group of people who has Yueh blood, but the Cantonese language was not the language of the Yueh. It's only a coincident that the Chinese language use the same word for the ancient people and the Cantonese langauge. The langauge and people have no connection, or very little connection at all. The southern Fukienese are actually more Yueh than the Cantonese are. The Yueh had their own ancient language, which was so different from what Cantonese is that it wouldn't be considered Cantonese. The Yueh spoke a language which was most likely the ancestor language of Vietnamese and, to an extent, Cantonese. But like Latin and it's descendents, French can't be called the language of the Romans, nor can Italian be. You're general lack in Vietnamese history, and general lack in logic, analytical and thinking skills astonishes me.
Vietnamese and Chinese are brothers, but the Yueh kingdom of Vietnam, of which the Vietnamese people are direct descendents from (recorded by Chinese and Vietnamese records if you ever have the urge to actually learn something), lived adjacent to the ancient Chinese kingdoms. Vietnamese nationalism is a show of loyalty to that original blood, not to what the Chinese gave us. If Vietnam was actually part of that original Chinese kingdom and broke off, then yes, we would be a derivative, but we didn't. We were separate, got conquered, then separated once again. We were a different entity, even during times of being conquered. The original Yueh tribe come from what is NOW southern China, but back then, that territory was neither Chinese nor did it belong to a Cantonese speaking ancestor. The area was originally occupied with only the Yueh and it's relatives, not the Han. If you even know what a Han is. If the Viets are Han, then we would be truly derived from the Chinese, but we are not, and even Chinese scholars admit we are descendents to the Yueh, and not the Han. The Yueh and Han fought constantly in ancient times, if you even bother to read anything at all.
And if you learn some Viet history, the Chinese has ALWAYS been our MOST HATED FOE. Since 2500 years ago when you first fought our people. This coming from a Viet, not a Chinese who wants to be Viet (an imposter you might say). Because if you were truly Vietnamese, this would've been a given. It does sicken me that the Vietnamese do hold racist views against the Chinese (which stems from the massacres and wars we had with eachother, which would make it understandable), but it is the truth, and any, and all, Viets would know this. So by just this, all i know is that you are not Vietnamese, and your ignorance of Vietnamese history can be justified. But because you opened your mouth on a subject you know nothing about astonishes me. Which gives you no justification at all. You remain an unintelligible wannabee who thinks he knows more than he really does. Who speaks without knowledge, nor with depth of thought.
