QUOTE (fujisan_8 @ Sep 18 2004, 11:25 PM)
I just have to say that building with destroy the HCMC skyline, just like how that stupid Taipei 101 sticks out like a sore thumb in the Taipei skyline (relatively short and more like a huge industrial city than your HKs, Tokyos, Seouls or Shanghais...all glitzy).
HCMC needs to consider these things:
1. Does it really need to this building, is it able to rent out the office space?
2. For that cost, they might as well build more apartment blocks or 10 smaller skyscrapers.
3. Will it look ridiciously out of place like Taipei 101? HCMC skyline is relatively short as well.
Just a note, there are heaps of skyscrapers with Asian designs, especially in China or more specifically, Beijing.
Asian countries are obesses with building a skyline these days. Just note that Japan is filthy rich yet Tokyo is a city built on a spawling design, that is horizontally outwards not like HK or New York which is built upwards (vertically designed).
*sigh*.
No, Bonday Ben Thanh will not look out of place since it is only 170+ metres tall. Saigon has already got a few buildings that are close to or over 100 metres in height, notably the Saigon Trade Center, which stands at 135 metres. Taipei is different since most buildings are no taller than 100 metres yet Taipei 101 is over 300 metres tall.
To answer your other questions:
1. Vietnamese office space is in high demand and predicted to accelerate in the upcoming years with the accession into the TWO and liberalisation of the economy etc.
2. It only cost USD55. It's better to build a nice and tall building than to build 2 small blocks. And no, USD55 won't buy you 10 smaller skyscrapers.
3. As explained above.
Well tall is beautiful, according to Asians. Besides, Saigon doesn't have all the space in the world so it should move upward, not outward. Besides, wouldn't it be more fun to have a more compacted and bustling city than having a huge city that requires alot of walking etc?