luumanh
Jun 28 2008, 12:35 AM
what do you think of renaming Vietnam back to Dai Viet or Viet Quoc?
qwe123
Jun 28 2008, 01:12 AM
i prefer Dai Viet
the name Viet NAM , imo referring us as "southern chinese"
while i dun want anything to do with them
Englanda
Jun 28 2008, 03:05 AM
Only 2 choices?
Can we call it
Bác Hồ, can we, can we?
or can we call it
UPOSEA (united provinces of south east asia)
or
Peter (cos it sounds friendly)
luumanh
Jun 28 2008, 04:36 AM
QUOTE(Englanda @ Jun 28 2008, 03:05 AM) [snapback]3780542[/snapback]
Only 2 choices?
Can we call it
Bác Hồ, can we, can we?
or can we call it
UPOSEA (united provinces of south east asia)
or
Peter (cos it sounds friendly)
stop trying to be funny
Suzuka00
Jun 28 2008, 06:39 AM
perhaps kinhland will work
Kaosq
Jun 28 2008, 11:54 AM
Vietnam sounds fine the way it is, no change needed IMO.
coldsunlight
Jun 28 2008, 11:55 AM
daivietian

sounds funny. We all are familiar with Vietnamese
daivietian chat

somebody might have spelling problems
Kaosq
Jun 28 2008, 11:57 AM
Not to mention VietQuocanese chat.
FrankJaegerTheGrayFox
Jun 28 2008, 01:44 PM
Yeah, I like the name Peter. It has a friendly ring to it.
Either that or DaiNamViet
SoCal
Jun 28 2008, 03:10 PM
QUOTE(Suzuka00 @ Jun 28 2008, 04:39 AM) [snapback]3780683[/snapback]
perhaps kinhland will work
The Kinh ethnic group represents about 80% to 85% of the Vietnamese population, while the other 53 ethnic groups represent 15% to 20% of the Vietnamese population.
It is in the Vietnamese Constitution that the Kinh along with other 53 ethnic groups that make up the Vietnamese population.
If the country is named Kinhland, then it ignores the 15% to 20% of Vietnamese. It is against the Vietnam Constitution.
luumanh
Jun 30 2008, 04:55 AM
QUOTE(Kaosq @ Jun 28 2008, 11:54 AM) [snapback]3780979[/snapback]
Vietnam sounds fine the way it is, no change needed IMO.
yes but it means that we are people south of china.
QUOTE(coldsunlight @ Jun 28 2008, 11:55 AM) [snapback]3780981[/snapback]
daivietian

sounds funny. We all are familiar with Vietnamese
daivietian chat

somebody might have spelling problems
QUOTE(Kaosq @ Jun 28 2008, 11:57 AM) [snapback]3780984[/snapback]
Not to mention VietQuocanese chat.

It could be just Viet chat.
BradPittJolie
Jun 30 2008, 06:15 AM
How about South China?
qwe123
Jun 30 2008, 07:23 AM
QUOTE(BradPittJolie @ Jun 30 2008, 06:15 AM) [snapback]3784490[/snapback]
How about South China?
how about you go $hit yourself?
srslybsns
Jun 30 2008, 03:00 PM
QUOTE(coldsunlight @ Jun 28 2008, 08:55 AM) [snapback]3780981[/snapback]
daivietian

sounds funny. We all are familiar with Vietnamese
daivietian chat

somebody might have spelling problems
No, in that case, we'd just be called
Viet... not 'Vietnamese'.
Name change is stupid. Why would you want to change the name of our motherland? Shows people don't care much for it.
luumanh
Jul 1 2008, 01:14 AM
QUOTE(srslybsns @ Jun 30 2008, 03:00 PM) [snapback]3785098[/snapback]
No, in that case, we'd just be called Viet... not 'Vietnamese'.
Name change is stupid. Why would you want to change the name of our motherland? Shows people don't care much for it.
the current name means that we are south of china, I don't want our country to be called south, north, west, or east of something.
srslybsns
Jul 1 2008, 02:07 AM
Who said? Does not VietNam just mean 'the Viets of the South'? We're south compared to all of Asia, not just China.
AEROFORCE1
Jul 1 2008, 02:37 AM
QUOTE(SoCal @ Jun 29 2008, 03:10 AM) [snapback]3781189[/snapback]
The Kinh ethnic group represents about 80% to 85% of the Vietnamese population, while the other 53 ethnic groups represent 15% to 20% of the Vietnamese population.
It is in the Vietnamese Constitution that the Kinh along with other 53 ethnic groups that make up the Vietnamese population.
If the country is named Kinhland, then it ignores the 15% to 20% of Vietnamese. It is against the Vietnam Constitution.
So then may be YuanLand
vietnam
Jul 1 2008, 10:07 AM
QUOTE(Kaosq @ Jun 28 2008, 11:54 AM) [snapback]3780979[/snapback]
Vietnam sounds fine the way it is, no change needed IMO.
I second you on that.
FrankJaegerTheGrayFox
Jul 1 2008, 10:09 AM
The current name "VietNam" was given by the Chinese. It supposed to be NamViet...or so I read somewhere....
vietnam
Jul 1 2008, 10:31 AM
QUOTE(FrankJaegerTheGrayFox @ Jul 1 2008, 10:09 AM) [snapback]3786496[/snapback]
The current name "VietNam" was given by the Chinese. It supposed to be NamViet...or so I read somewhere....
I afraid you got mixed up....."An Nam" (Peaceful South) was the name Imperial China called our land, hoping for a pacified territory. Viet Nam is a modern name adopted during one of the Nguyen emperors' ruling.
FrankJaegerTheGrayFox
Jul 1 2008, 10:38 AM
QUOTE
[..]in 1804, King Gia Long planned to use the name of Nam Việt for Vietnam but the Qing dynasty of China disagreed and changed it to Việt Nam.
http://209.85.141.104/search?q=cache:0Ktc9...;cd=2&gl=us
vietnam
Jul 1 2008, 11:18 AM
QUOTE(FrankJaegerTheGrayFox @ Jul 1 2008, 10:38 AM) [snapback]3786529[/snapback]
Thanks for the detail.....I didn't know.
Englanda
Jul 1 2008, 11:24 AM
Guys, it's just part of your / our identity, changing it superficially does not make sense.
What next? Erasing all the Han-Nom writing in temples and sheet? Changing 30+% of our vocab cos they originate from up there? Stop using paper cos it was originally invented by the Chinese?
Let's just be cool about your culture and identity and not let an inferiority complex (real or imagined) ruin your day.
"Tổ quốc tôi chưa đẹp thế bao giờ"
FrankJaegerTheGrayFox
Jul 1 2008, 12:29 PM
^"If we let X happen, the first thing you know Y will be happening." This is a form of slippery slope . Such claims are fallacious when in fact there is no reason to think that X will lead to Y. Sometimes X and Y can be the same of thing or can bear some kind of similarity to one another, but that doesn't mean that one will inevitably lead to the other.
As for the name change it would be nice to see a new name...but its gonna cost.I'm not enthusiastic about it but it would be nice, no?
Englanda
Jul 1 2008, 01:54 PM
^ Why not?
If X, Y and Z all have contaminant C that need purifying, why would you stop at X?
FrankJaegerTheGrayFox
Jul 1 2008, 02:28 PM
If you argue that by experience with certain drugs, it will leads to serious addiction or dependence. In this case, drugs are known to be addictive there is no fallacy present the likelihood of the progression is clear. However, you argue by changing Vietnam's current name will lead to many other things such as erasing Han-Nom, stop using paper, etc... is a logical fallacy of slippery slope. If chosen to change the name, it will not necessary or inevitably lead to erasing Han-Nom, stop using paper and so on. Unless there is some sounds reason to explain why it will lead to those things.
XigonCongchua
Jul 1 2008, 03:34 PM
QUOTE(luumanh @ Jun 30 2008, 11:14 PM) [snapback]3786040[/snapback]
the current name means that we are south of china, I don't want our country to be called south, north, west, or east of something.
if you look at it using Vietnamese grammar it actually means Southern Viet or Viet of the South because in our grammar we put the modifier after the modified (adjective after noun).
In this case of "Việt Nam", Việt is the main noun, Nam is the modifier for Việt. So we are the Viet people of the South or Viet people in the South.
In any case, the name of our country is the combination of the ethnic name "Việt" and the geography location "Nam" meaning "South"
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.